Home / alt.fashion / Monday, March 13, 2006

Three 6 Mafia and the Oscars (or why I hate liberals)

"abazaba3" <abaza...@hotmail.com>
You wanna know a little secret? Three Six = Larry The Cable Guy. Except
Three Six is even dumber.
There really is a double standard in our culture. Look at how reviled
Larry The Cable Guy is. Yet Three Six act dumber than Larry The Cable
Guy, wear dumber looking clothes than Larry The Cable Guy, the marble
mouth accents they speak in are dumber than the twang Larry The Cable
Guy speaks in, and overall put out a much more anti–intellectual
product than Larry The Cable Guy. And every avante garde, politically
correct, pseudo–intellectual, overeducated, jewish newspaper and
magazine columnist line up to praise them. From the New York Times to
pitchforkmedia.com, they all can't wait to say that Three Six are
artististic geniuses, because heaping praise on trashy, ghetto,
low–class, sub normal people makes them look intellectual and elite, as
long as the trashy ghetto people they're praising are blacks. Village
Voice, Washington Post, La Times, and Rolling Stone like Three Six!
Look at how urbane they are! The music journalists are so hip and
intelligent because they like illiterate blacks that rap about
criminality in dem accents dey be using, have you ever seen something
so cutting edge! And of course the newspapers and magazines sell like
hotcakes because guilty white liberals eat that shit up. Liking the
black equivalents of Hillbilly Jim makes white liberals from
metropolitan areas feel cultured.
And if were offended by anything in this post, you're the kind of
people I'm talking about.
"FDR" <_remove_spam_block_rzi...@hotmail.com>


"abazaba3" <abaza...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1142257226.900086.292...@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...

You wanna know a little secret? Three Six = Larry The Cable Guy. Except
Three Six is even dumber.
There really is a double standard in our culture. Look at how reviled
Larry The Cable Guy is. Yet Three Six act dumber than Larry The Cable
Guy, wear dumber looking clothes than Larry The Cable Guy, the marble
mouth accents they speak in are dumber than the twang Larry The Cable
Guy speaks in, and overall put out a much more anti–intellectual
product than Larry The Cable Guy. And every avante garde, politically
correct, pseudo–intellectual, overeducated, jewish newspaper and
magazine columnist line up to praise them. From the New York Times to
pitchforkmedia.com, they all can't wait to say that Three Six are
artististic geniuses, because heaping praise on trashy, ghetto,
low–class, sub normal people makes them look intellectual and elite, as
long as the trashy ghetto people they're praising are blacks. Village
Voice, Washington Post, La Times, and Rolling Stone like Three Six!
Look at how urbane they are! The music journalists are so hip and
intelligent because they like illiterate blacks that rap about
criminality in dem accents dey be using, have you ever seen something
so cutting edge! And of course the newspapers and magazines sell like
hotcakes because guilty white liberals eat that shit up. Liking the
black equivalents of Hillbilly Jim makes white liberals from
metropolitan areas feel cultured.
And if were offended by anything in this post, you're the kind of
people I'm talking about.
And back in the 60's, Elvis was the devil's child for rotating his hips.
abaza...@hotmail.com
FDR wrote:


"abazaba3" <abaza...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1142257226.900086.292...@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...

And back in the 60's, Elvis was the devil's child for rotating his hips.
Thanks for the non–seqiter reply.
"Proud Liberal Bitch" <Maggin...@gmail.com>
I'm not sure which is worse.... your rant or this explanation give by
Chicken george trying to explain the new Medicare
Bill..............Both of you sound like total idiots.
WOMAN IN AUDIENCE: 'I don't really understand. How is the new plan
going to fix the problem?'
Verbatim response: PRESIDENT BUSH:
'Because the –– all which is on the table begins to address the big
cost drivers. For example, how benefits are calculated, for example, is
on the table. Whether or not benefits rise based upon wage increases or
price increases. There's a series of parts of the formula that are
being considered. And when you couple that, those different cost
drivers, affecting those –– changing those with personal accounts, the
idea is to get what has been promised more likely to be –– or closer
delivered to that has been promised. Does that make any sense to you?
It's kind of muddled. Look, there's a series of things that cause the
–– like, for example, benefits are calculated based upon the increase
of wages, as opposed to the increase of prices. Some have suggested
that we calculate –– the benefits will rise based upon inflation,
supposed to wage increases. There is a reform that would help solve the
red if that were put into effect. In other words, how fast benefits
grow, how fast the promised benefits grow, if those –– if that growth
is affected, it will help on the red.'
"The RSF Group" <aegisi...@hotmail.com>
shut up bitch.
"Looney Tunes" <kst...@hawkpci.net>
The RSF Group wrote:
shut up bitch.
Good Grief. I have left alt.fashion and google groups for a website
called democraticunderground.com. Nobody would ever use "shut up bitch"
as a rebuttal there. sigh
"FDR" <_remove_spam_block_rzi...@hotmail.com>


<abaza...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1142267652.835382.56...@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

FDR wrote:
Thanks for the non–seqiter reply.
Just putting your rant in perspective.