Home / alt.fashion / Thursday, February 23, 2006
<casiocult...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1140717722.788749.54...@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Jamie
<casiocult...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1140717722.788749.54...@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Why are you so interested in this subject?
"EMiriamD" <emiri...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1140797291.552940.311...@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Jamie
<casiocult...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1140717722.788749.54...@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
affecting the $ statistics of gold sales for teeth? While I personally don't
have any friends or family with grills, the amount of them I've seen on
people out and about is shocking. I've even seen them with relief sculptures
on them. (I know the wearers think it's cool but in my mind any visible gold
in the front of the mouth is processed by my brain as "ooooh, baaaaad
teeth". )
What happened to gold teeth?
casiocult...@gmail.com
2/23/2006 10:02:02 AM
"The value of gold used for industrial purposes and gold teeth
increased from $5.4 billion in 2004 to $6 billion last year." From link
below.
Sounds like someone is still getting gold teeth, I haven't met one for
decades!
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,9072–2053714,00.html
increased from $5.4 billion in 2004 to $6 billion last year." From link
below.
Sounds like someone is still getting gold teeth, I haven't met one for
decades!
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,9072–2053714,00.html
"Jamie" <zuschlag–sequ...@tds.net>
2/23/2006 3:49:17 PM
<casiocult...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1140717722.788749.54...@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
"The value of gold used for industrial purposes and gold teeth
increased from $5.4 billion in 2004 to $6 billion last year." From link
below.
Sounds like someone is still getting gold teeth, I haven't met one for
decades!
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,9072–2053714,00.html
Do they mean crowns? I have some (recent). increased from $5.4 billion in 2004 to $6 billion last year." From link
below.
Sounds like someone is still getting gold teeth, I haven't met one for
decades!
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,9072–2053714,00.html
Jamie
"ikr" <ik_._r...@_ntlworld_._com>
2/23/2006 9:54:56 PM
<casiocult...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1140717722.788749.54...@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
"The value of gold used for industrial purposes and gold teeth
increased from $5.4 billion in 2004 to $6 billion last year." From link
below.
Sounds like someone is still getting gold teeth, I haven't met one for
decades!
Do you throw out your gold teeth? Do you see how they roll? increased from $5.4 billion in 2004 to $6 billion last year." From link
below.
Sounds like someone is still getting gold teeth, I haven't met one for
decades!
Stacy Ferguson <stac...@stacyef.net>
2/23/2006 10:11:52 PM
In article <1140717722.788749.54...@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
casiocult...@gmail.com wrote:
porcelain overlay because porcelain only crowns are fragile. For front
teeth, porcelain only crowns are a first choice because while they may
be weaker, they're translucent like natural teeth and don't stick out as
"fake". Opacity of molar crowns isn't as big a deal esthetically because
they aren't as visible and light transparency isn't as big an issue in
the dark parts of one's mouth.
Stacy
casiocult...@gmail.com wrote:
"The value of gold used for industrial purposes and gold teeth
increased from $5.4 billion in 2004 to $6 billion last year." From link
below.
Sounds like someone is still getting gold teeth, I haven't met one for
decades!
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,9072–2053714,00.html
While obvious gold crowns are now unusual, most crowns are gold with a increased from $5.4 billion in 2004 to $6 billion last year." From link
below.
Sounds like someone is still getting gold teeth, I haven't met one for
decades!
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,9072–2053714,00.html
porcelain overlay because porcelain only crowns are fragile. For front
teeth, porcelain only crowns are a first choice because while they may
be weaker, they're translucent like natural teeth and don't stick out as
"fake". Opacity of molar crowns isn't as big a deal esthetically because
they aren't as visible and light transparency isn't as big an issue in
the dark parts of one's mouth.
Stacy
casiocult...@gmail.com
2/24/2006 6:12:31 AM
Stacy Ferguson wrote:
In article <1140717722.788749.54...@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
casiocult...@gmail.com wrote:
While obvious gold crowns are now unusual, most crowns are gold with a
porcelain overlay because porcelain only crowns are fragile. For front
teeth, porcelain only crowns are a first choice because while they may
be weaker, they're translucent like natural teeth and don't stick out as
"fake". Opacity of molar crowns isn't as big a deal esthetically because
they aren't as visible and light transparency isn't as big an issue in
the dark parts of one's mouth.
Stacy
Why gold? Why don't they use aluminum or some other metal? casiocult...@gmail.com wrote:
While obvious gold crowns are now unusual, most crowns are gold with a
porcelain overlay because porcelain only crowns are fragile. For front
teeth, porcelain only crowns are a first choice because while they may
be weaker, they're translucent like natural teeth and don't stick out as
"fake". Opacity of molar crowns isn't as big a deal esthetically because
they aren't as visible and light transparency isn't as big an issue in
the dark parts of one's mouth.
Stacy
"EMiriamD" <emiri...@gmail.com>
2/24/2006 8:08:11 AM
Why gold? Why don't they use aluminum or some other metal?
Purity and durability. Why are you so interested in this subject?
"Jamie" <zuschlag–sequ...@tds.net>
2/24/2006 11:41:33 AM
"EMiriamD" <emiri...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1140797291.552940.311...@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Purity and durability.
My thoughts exactly. Jamie
Charlie Perrin <nikve...@sbcglobal.netNOSPAM>
2/24/2006 6:14:13 PM
On 24 Feb 2006 06:12:31 –0800, casioculture wrote:
––
Visit Charlie's Sneaker Pages!
http://sneakers.pair.com/
Why gold? Why don't they use aluminum or some other metal?
Mainly nonreactivity. ––
Visit Charlie's Sneaker Pages!
http://sneakers.pair.com/
"Queue" <qu...@fashionhouse.com>
2/24/2006 12:24:43 PM
<casiocult...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1140717722.788749.54...@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
"The value of gold used for industrial purposes and gold teeth
increased from $5.4 billion in 2004 to $6 billion last year." From link
below.
Sounds like someone is still getting gold teeth, I haven't met one for
decades!
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,9072–2053714,00.html
Could it be that the grills (for teeth) have become so popular that it is increased from $5.4 billion in 2004 to $6 billion last year." From link
below.
Sounds like someone is still getting gold teeth, I haven't met one for
decades!
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,9072–2053714,00.html
affecting the $ statistics of gold sales for teeth? While I personally don't
have any friends or family with grills, the amount of them I've seen on
people out and about is shocking. I've even seen them with relief sculptures
on them. (I know the wearers think it's cool but in my mind any visible gold
in the front of the mouth is processed by my brain as "ooooh, baaaaad
teeth". )
mogga <...@NOSPAMPLEASEmogga.com>
2/25/2006 12:37:10 PM
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:14:13 GMT, Charlie Perrin
<nikve...@sbcglobal.netNOSPAM> wrote:
––
Get money off vouchers for everything
http://www.moneyoffvouchers.co.uk
<nikve...@sbcglobal.netNOSPAM> wrote:
On 24 Feb 2006 06:12:31 –0800, casioculture wrote:
Mainly nonreactivity.
yes having nickel crowns would be horrid. Mainly nonreactivity.
––
Get money off vouchers for everything
http://www.moneyoffvouchers.co.uk