Charles & Camilla – Geriatric Lovers Fail to Take Manhattan

http://www.nypost.com/commentary/56748.htm
UNTOUCHED DUCHESS IN RESTRICTED HEIR SPACE
By ANDREA PEYSER
November 2, 2005 –– CHARLES, meet Camilla. Camilla, here's Chuck.
If you missed their wedding on TV, you'd think that the red–hot
geriatric lovers who came over yesterday from Britain had never met.
Or maybe they've just grown accustomed to sneaking around — after all,
they were secret adulterers for decades.
Prince Charles unveiled his new wife yesterday to an adoring,
forgiving America.
Well, sort of.
In his debut appearance as a married prince, Charles jumped out of an
SUV in the dankest, meanest, windiest corner of lower Manhattan — a
spot that remained teeth–chatteringly frigid, despite otherwise
glorious weather.
Maybe they picked that corner on Hanover Square because the weather
reminded Charles of home. But the prince had clearly learned the
lessons of American–style retail politics — he body–surfed through a
wildly cheering crowd, shaking hands like Bill Clinton on a Big Mac
buzz.
But Charles seems to have forgotten something.
Camilla.
Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, walked four paces behind her beloved
as the pair showed up before the cameras, the governor and Tina Brown
to unveil the cornerstone in a tiny garden dedicated to the 67 Britons
who died on 9/11.
But Charles never touched her.
He never looked at Camilla.
Never took the lady's arm.
He failed to brush her back. Steer her by the elbow. Bump into her
airspace.
Camilla was on her own.
Charles continued to shun his bride later on. He walked several paces
ahead of her into the Museum of Modern Art, where the pair were guests
of honor at a cocktail shindig.
Though it was billed as a celeb–studded soiree, the famous stayed away
in droves — no Robert De Niro, Steven Spielberg or Kim Cattrall. Until
Sting showed up — late — the biggest name in the room was Yoko Ono.
Earlier in the day, Camilla created a fashion faux pas when she
arrived at Ground Zero tarted up in a velvet–trimmed getup in an
unfortunately loud color that some would charitably describe as poppy.
I'll call it raspberry. Black would have been preferable.
But by the time she hit the museum, Camilla had changed into an
appropriate, if overly pouffy, blue velvet schmatta that nonetheless
revealed a tad too much cleavage for my taste and her age.
Charles spent the evening clutching a cocktail and holding court
across the room from his Camilla. But then, I may have stumbled on the
secret of their happy union.
When Charles was wed to Diana, it was she who drew every eye in the
room. In contrast, Camilla poses no competition for her husband.
The crowd circulated around Charles — everyone from Barbara Walters to
Deborah Norville vied for an audience. Camilla made do with Henry
Kissinger.
Welcome to New York, royals. We're a pretty tolerant lot here in
America — willing to forgive the years of running around behind
Diana's back, the puke–inducing phone–sex sessions, the bad teeth.
You can call their story a triumph of true love.
But hey — we know you're together. Act like it.

Hahaha. Good one. So somebody has been around long enough to remember
they were adulterers.
Boy, things are rough when even other famous fellow adulterers won't
show up for your party.
Oh, Entertainment Tonight just called Camilla FRUMP TOWER again. Let
us hope she is not serving up those tired old breasts at the White
House tonight.

Hahaha. Good one. So somebody has been around long enough to remember
they were adulterers.
Boy, things are rough when even other famous fellow adulterers won't
show up for your party.
Oh, Entertainment Tonight just called Camilla FRUMP TOWER again. Let
us hope she is not serving up those tired old breasts at the White
House tonight.

On 2 Nov 2005 16:37:43 –0800, in alt.gossip.celebrities, "Lux" <luxperpe...@aol.com>
arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :
... Hahaha. Good one. So somebody has been around long enough to remember
... they were adulterers.
...
... Boy, things are rough when even other famous fellow adulterers won't
... show up for your party.
...
... Oh, Entertainment Tonight just called Camilla FRUMP TOWER again. Let
... us hope she is not serving up those tired old breasts at the White
... House tonight.
Pics, anyone?

Red–Hot Geriatric Lovers wrote:
Which is EXACTLY what she should have done ! All this article proves is
that the New York Post in general and Andrea Peyser in particular knows
little about Royals.
––
The Verminator

the_vermina...@comcast.net wrote:
And nor do they NEED to know "about Royals". We are AMERICAN. We fought
a war to emancipate ourselves from these fuckers, like hundreds of
years ago. Fuck Charles and Camilla.

I presume you will be leaving AGR soon, then?
Breton

"Breton" wrote ...
She might not be on AGR. Look at all the groups this was crossposted to.
Kelly
––
What we see depends mainly on what we look for.

Yawn...
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.....

bojangles wrote:
I second that motion.
––
Alex
http://www.BitchAboutIt.net
"Because Life's Too Short Not To!"

"Miss Information" <getsomebeni...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1130982479.811025.163...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Yes and you have been culturally and linguistically independent of them for
all of this time, including the period where you needed political and
military assistance in "the war on terror", so the Brit Royal family had no
business being at ground zero to show solidarity with you did they?

Speaking of brains that do not function, does anyone know who this post is
referring to?


"Breton" <royalistper...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1130982940.589873.198...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

On 2–Nov–2005, "Miss Information" <getsomebeni...@yahoo.com> wrote:
We, definitely, would be the first!

Wull wrote:
Miss Information. Breton is under the impression that only those
favorable to all royals at all times should be allowed to post on a
royals *gossip* newsgroup. You know, everybody thinks the same thing
about everybody and everything.
But, you are right, he doesn't seem to have worked out how to reply to
a particular post –– well, postER since he spends more time on the
posters than the content of their posts. Oh, and watch out, he sptso
tpyos for fun and malice :)
yD