Home / alt.fashion / Monday, May 23, 2005

moisturizing underwear

Leigh Melton <le...@nbi.com>
I read about this on Popgadget and thought "huh?" but it's for real...
http://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/NewsDetails.asp?News_id=14645
"USA : Olga’s Smooth Benefits intimate apparelwear incorporates Lycra
Body Care technology
22nd April 2005
"Premier lingerie brand Olga is expanding the scope of intimate
apparel with its new line Smooth Benefits with LYCRA Body Care. This
new daywear collection is more than just a light and comfortable layer
under clothing; it uses microencapsulated moisture bead technology
that allows skin to maintain its natural moisture balance. As a
result, skin feels moisturized and soft throughout the day"
[rest of article at URL above]
Leigh
––
Consequences, shmonsequences, as long as I'm rich. – D. Duck
Leigh Melton <le...@nbi.com>
I read about this on Popgadget and thought "huh?" but it's for real...
http://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/NewsDetails.asp?News_id=14645
"USA : Olga’s Smooth Benefits intimate apparelwear incorporates Lycra
Body Care technology
22nd April 2005
"Premier lingerie brand Olga is expanding the scope of intimate
apparel with its new line Smooth Benefits with LYCRA Body Care. This
new daywear collection is more than just a light and comfortable layer
under clothing; it uses microencapsulated moisture bead technology
that allows skin to maintain its natural moisture balance. As a
result, skin feels moisturized and soft throughout the day"
[rest of article at URL above]
Leigh
––
Consequences, shmonsequences, as long as I'm rich. – D. Duck
"K.M." <drew13...@aol.com>
I did a focus group last summer––not sure which company it was for––but
it was for pantyhose that was designed to make your skin look smoother,
more moisturized, and more toned (ie. less cellulite.) I didn't feel
that it moisturized and I sure didn't feel that it make my legs look
more toned or made any difference to cellulite.
"K.M." <drew13...@aol.com>
I did a focus group last summer––not sure which company it was for––but
it was for pantyhose that was designed to make your skin look smoother,
more moisturized, and more toned (ie. less cellulite.) I didn't feel
that it moisturized and I sure didn't feel that it make my legs look
more toned or made any difference to cellulite.
"K.M." <drew13...@aol.com>
I did a focus group last summer––not sure which company it was for––but
it was for pantyhose that was designed to make your skin look smoother,
more moisturized, and more toned (ie. less cellulite.) I didn't feel
that it moisturized and I sure didn't feel that it make my legs look
more toned or made any difference to cellulite.
"K.M." <drew13...@aol.com>
I did a focus group last summer––not sure which company it was for––but
it was for pantyhose that was designed to make your skin look smoother,
more moisturized, and more toned (ie. less cellulite.) I didn't feel
that it moisturized and I sure didn't feel that it make my legs look
more toned or made any difference to cellulite.
"Barbara" <mom_2_...@hotmail.com>
K.M. wrote:
I did a focus group last summer––not sure which company it was
for––but
it was for pantyhose that was designed to make your skin look
smoother,
more moisturized, and more toned (ie. less cellulite.) I didn't feel
that it moisturized and I sure didn't feel that it make my legs look
more toned or made any difference to cellulite.
Okay, pantyhose, I get. But pnaties????? Now, not to be really gross,
but how do they ensure that the moisture goes one way (into skin), or
is there is risk of a greasy stain on your clothes, making it look like
you had an accident?
Barbara
"Barbara" <mom_2_...@hotmail.com>
K.M. wrote:
I did a focus group last summer––not sure which company it was
for––but
it was for pantyhose that was designed to make your skin look
smoother,
more moisturized, and more toned (ie. less cellulite.) I didn't feel
that it moisturized and I sure didn't feel that it make my legs look
more toned or made any difference to cellulite.
Okay, pantyhose, I get. But pnaties????? Now, not to be really gross,
but how do they ensure that the moisture goes one way (into skin), or
is there is risk of a greasy stain on your clothes, making it look like
you had an accident?
Barbara
"Barbara" <mom_2_...@hotmail.com>
K.M. wrote:
I did a focus group last summer––not sure which company it was
for––but
it was for pantyhose that was designed to make your skin look
smoother,
more moisturized, and more toned (ie. less cellulite.) I didn't feel
that it moisturized and I sure didn't feel that it make my legs look
more toned or made any difference to cellulite.
Okay, pantyhose, I get. But pnaties????? Now, not to be really gross,
but how do they ensure that the moisture goes one way (into skin), or
is there is risk of a greasy stain on your clothes, making it look like
you had an accident?
Barbara
"Barbara" <mom_2_...@hotmail.com>
K.M. wrote:
I did a focus group last summer––not sure which company it was
for––but
it was for pantyhose that was designed to make your skin look
smoother,
more moisturized, and more toned (ie. less cellulite.) I didn't feel
that it moisturized and I sure didn't feel that it make my legs look
more toned or made any difference to cellulite.
Okay, pantyhose, I get. But pnaties????? Now, not to be really gross,
but how do they ensure that the moisture goes one way (into skin), or
is there is risk of a greasy stain on your clothes, making it look like
you had an accident?
Barbara
"Trianna" <triannadun...@hotmail.com>
Barbara wrote:
K.M. wrote:
for––but
smoother,
Okay, pantyhose, I get. But pnaties????? Now, not to be really
gross,
but how do they ensure that the moisture goes one way (into skin), or
is there is risk of a greasy stain on your clothes, making it look
like
you had an accident?
That was one question I had. Another question I had was whether anyone
else finds that their derriere ***needs*** extra moisturizing. My
legs, sure, but my bottom hasn't been chapped since I was two.
T.
"Trianna" <triannadun...@hotmail.com>
Barbara wrote:
K.M. wrote:
for––but
smoother,
Okay, pantyhose, I get. But pnaties????? Now, not to be really
gross,
but how do they ensure that the moisture goes one way (into skin), or
is there is risk of a greasy stain on your clothes, making it look
like
you had an accident?
That was one question I had. Another question I had was whether anyone
else finds that their derriere ***needs*** extra moisturizing. My
legs, sure, but my bottom hasn't been chapped since I was two.
T.
"Trianna" <triannadun...@hotmail.com>
Barbara wrote:
K.M. wrote:
for––but
smoother,
Okay, pantyhose, I get. But pnaties????? Now, not to be really
gross,
but how do they ensure that the moisture goes one way (into skin), or
is there is risk of a greasy stain on your clothes, making it look
like
you had an accident?
That was one question I had. Another question I had was whether anyone
else finds that their derriere ***needs*** extra moisturizing. My
legs, sure, but my bottom hasn't been chapped since I was two.
T.
"Trianna" <triannadun...@hotmail.com>
Barbara wrote:
K.M. wrote:
for––but
smoother,
Okay, pantyhose, I get. But pnaties????? Now, not to be really
gross,
but how do they ensure that the moisture goes one way (into skin), or
is there is risk of a greasy stain on your clothes, making it look
like
you had an accident?
That was one question I had. Another question I had was whether anyone
else finds that their derriere ***needs*** extra moisturizing. My
legs, sure, but my bottom hasn't been chapped since I was two.
T.
"Jane" <colormej...@aol.com>
Uhhh.....it's not the derriere part I'm worried about needing
moisturizing....
Anonymous, heh heh
"Jane" <colormej...@aol.com>
Uhhh.....it's not the derriere part I'm worried about needing
moisturizing....
Anonymous, heh heh
"Jane" <colormej...@aol.com>
Uhhh.....it's not the derriere part I'm worried about needing
moisturizing....
Anonymous, heh heh
"Jane" <colormej...@aol.com>
Uhhh.....it's not the derriere part I'm worried about needing
moisturizing....
Anonymous, heh heh
"Smokey" <SmokeyinNewEngl...@yahooey.com>


"Leigh Melton" <le...@nbi.com> wrote in message
news:vt4491tcn3cbrvaq5m3lki3m1npmh3v...@4ax.com...

I read about this on Popgadget and thought "huh?" but it's for real...
http://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/NewsDetails.asp?News_id=14645
"USA : Olga's Smooth Benefits intimate apparelwear incorporates Lycra
Body Care technology
22nd April 2005
"Premier lingerie brand Olga is expanding the scope of intimate
apparel with its new line Smooth Benefits with LYCRA Body Care. This
new daywear collection is more than just a light and comfortable layer
under clothing; it uses microencapsulated moisture bead technology
that allows skin to maintain its natural moisture balance. As a
result, skin feels moisturized and soft throughout the day"
[rest of article at URL above]
Leigh
You find the most amazing things, Leigh!
Smokey
"Smokey" <SmokeyinNewEngl...@yahooey.com>


"Leigh Melton" <le...@nbi.com> wrote in message
news:vt4491tcn3cbrvaq5m3lki3m1npmh3v...@4ax.com...

I read about this on Popgadget and thought "huh?" but it's for real...
http://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/NewsDetails.asp?News_id=14645
"USA : Olga's Smooth Benefits intimate apparelwear incorporates Lycra
Body Care technology
22nd April 2005
"Premier lingerie brand Olga is expanding the scope of intimate
apparel with its new line Smooth Benefits with LYCRA Body Care. This
new daywear collection is more than just a light and comfortable layer
under clothing; it uses microencapsulated moisture bead technology
that allows skin to maintain its natural moisture balance. As a
result, skin feels moisturized and soft throughout the day"
[rest of article at URL above]
Leigh
You find the most amazing things, Leigh!
Smokey
"Smokey" <SmokeyinNewEngl...@yahooey.com>


"Leigh Melton" <le...@nbi.com> wrote in message
news:vt4491tcn3cbrvaq5m3lki3m1npmh3v...@4ax.com...

I read about this on Popgadget and thought "huh?" but it's for real...
http://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/NewsDetails.asp?News_id=14645
"USA : Olga's Smooth Benefits intimate apparelwear incorporates Lycra
Body Care technology
22nd April 2005
"Premier lingerie brand Olga is expanding the scope of intimate
apparel with its new line Smooth Benefits with LYCRA Body Care. This
new daywear collection is more than just a light and comfortable layer
under clothing; it uses microencapsulated moisture bead technology
that allows skin to maintain its natural moisture balance. As a
result, skin feels moisturized and soft throughout the day"
[rest of article at URL above]
Leigh
You find the most amazing things, Leigh!
Smokey
"Smokey" <SmokeyinNewEngl...@yahooey.com>


"Leigh Melton" <le...@nbi.com> wrote in message
news:vt4491tcn3cbrvaq5m3lki3m1npmh3v...@4ax.com...

I read about this on Popgadget and thought "huh?" but it's for real...
http://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/NewsDetails.asp?News_id=14645
"USA : Olga's Smooth Benefits intimate apparelwear incorporates Lycra
Body Care technology
22nd April 2005
"Premier lingerie brand Olga is expanding the scope of intimate
apparel with its new line Smooth Benefits with LYCRA Body Care. This
new daywear collection is more than just a light and comfortable layer
under clothing; it uses microencapsulated moisture bead technology
that allows skin to maintain its natural moisture balance. As a
result, skin feels moisturized and soft throughout the day"
[rest of article at URL above]
Leigh
You find the most amazing things, Leigh!
Smokey
Leigh Melton <le...@nbi.com>
On 23 May 2005 12:04:24 –0700, "Trianna" <triannadun...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Barbara wrote:
gross,
like
That was one question I had. Another question I had was whether anyone
else finds that their derriere ***needs*** extra moisturizing. My
legs, sure, but my bottom hasn't been chapped since I was two.
My derriere isn't chapped, but I do use moisturizer to keep my skin
from being dry (which it tends to be).
As for the other issue, I looked around for some kind of explanation
of how it can be available for absorption by skin but not one's
clothes (yuk!!!) but couldn't find one. I emailed Vermont Lingerie
Chest and asked, maybe they can give some insight.
I'm still not sure I'd be interested in wearing the stuff, but I would
be interested in an answer to that question!
Leigh
––
Consequences, shmonsequences, as long as I'm rich. – D. Duck
Leigh Melton <le...@nbi.com>
On 23 May 2005 12:04:24 –0700, "Trianna" <triannadun...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Barbara wrote:
gross,
like
That was one question I had. Another question I had was whether anyone
else finds that their derriere ***needs*** extra moisturizing. My
legs, sure, but my bottom hasn't been chapped since I was two.
My derriere isn't chapped, but I do use moisturizer to keep my skin
from being dry (which it tends to be).
As for the other issue, I looked around for some kind of explanation
of how it can be available for absorption by skin but not one's
clothes (yuk!!!) but couldn't find one. I emailed Vermont Lingerie
Chest and asked, maybe they can give some insight.
I'm still not sure I'd be interested in wearing the stuff, but I would
be interested in an answer to that question!
Leigh
––
Consequences, shmonsequences, as long as I'm rich. – D. Duck
Leigh Melton <le...@nbi.com>
On 23 May 2005 12:04:24 –0700, "Trianna" <triannadun...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Barbara wrote:
gross,
like
That was one question I had. Another question I had was whether anyone
else finds that their derriere ***needs*** extra moisturizing. My
legs, sure, but my bottom hasn't been chapped since I was two.
My derriere isn't chapped, but I do use moisturizer to keep my skin
from being dry (which it tends to be).
As for the other issue, I looked around for some kind of explanation
of how it can be available for absorption by skin but not one's
clothes (yuk!!!) but couldn't find one. I emailed Vermont Lingerie
Chest and asked, maybe they can give some insight.
I'm still not sure I'd be interested in wearing the stuff, but I would
be interested in an answer to that question!
Leigh
––
Consequences, shmonsequences, as long as I'm rich. – D. Duck
Leigh Melton <le...@nbi.com>
On 23 May 2005 12:04:24 –0700, "Trianna" <triannadun...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Barbara wrote:
gross,
like
That was one question I had. Another question I had was whether anyone
else finds that their derriere ***needs*** extra moisturizing. My
legs, sure, but my bottom hasn't been chapped since I was two.
My derriere isn't chapped, but I do use moisturizer to keep my skin
from being dry (which it tends to be).
As for the other issue, I looked around for some kind of explanation
of how it can be available for absorption by skin but not one's
clothes (yuk!!!) but couldn't find one. I emailed Vermont Lingerie
Chest and asked, maybe they can give some insight.
I'm still not sure I'd be interested in wearing the stuff, but I would
be interested in an answer to that question!
Leigh
––
Consequences, shmonsequences, as long as I'm rich. – D. Duck
"EMiriamD" <emiri...@gmail.com>
Allure rated this product and basically said it's ridiculous.
"EMiriamD" <emiri...@gmail.com>
Allure rated this product and basically said it's ridiculous.