On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 04:50:01 0800, "Stevie"
<privilegemagaz...@charter.net> wrote:
HI there
got this in an email newsletter. .. what's your take on this?
http://desirelosangeles.com/article.php?ArticleID=132
and what do you think of her comments about the mules being worn here in LA?
I know for non LA people, this might sound stupid but until this past
weekend, it's been incredibly lovely here. If it's warm enough, why not wear
the mules?
I live in Georgia where this is the time of year that it can be 72 or
42, it just all depends. On the 72 degree days I'm going to wear open
footwear if I want to, I don't care if it is near Thanksgiving.
I've often stood in front of my closet thinking "I shouldn't wear
this" because it's a lighterweight item, but then I think yeah, so I
should wear a "seasonally appropriate" sweater even though I'll be hot
and uncomfortable? Seasonally appropriate to whom? Seasons around
here don't neatly fit the New Yorker's calendar, sorry. I'm going for
what is Weather Appropriate. That can vary almost daily.
This comment is what first alerted me to a serious gap between her
views and mine: "Though “no white after labor day” is a tired rule
that should be ignored, wearing sandals to work once the temperature
has dipped below 65F is cringeworthy."
So one rule is tired and one rule should never, ever be broken. I
notice she didn't defend either position.
Personally I think fur in the office is a general nono. Emotions run
high on the subject of wearing (real) fur. While I don't wear it
myself, IMO it's a personal choice for everyone to make and don't
think one person's ideas should dictate another's choices. You still
run the risk of offending someone by wearing it, from corporate
officers to clients. Plus, as someone pointed out, it's like wearing
sequins to work. Fine if that's your corporate culture, but I would
think most aren't like that.
Leigh
Consequences, shmonsequences, as long as I'm rich. D. Duck