Home / alt.fashion / Thursday, November 18, 2004
Re: Hairdressers are butchers
ManualIns...@DB.com
11/18/2004 10:00:42 PM
Ruddell <ruddell'Elle–Kabo...@canada.com>
11/18/2004 11:00:42 PM
In <Pine.LNX.4.44.0411181022470.580–100...@adams.patriot.net> Martha
Gallagher wrote:
signs about no refunds in stores but should be if that's the policy, but
for hair salons maybe some satisfaction policy might be in order???
––
Cheers
Dennis
Remove 'Elle–Kabong' to reply
Gallagher wrote:
Exactly. If I hire a housepainter to paint my house white and he goes
for fuschia 'cause he thinks it'll look better, I doubt any court
would order me to pay up. I'd say the same applies to a hairdresser
who is asked for a trim and decides that the client would look better
with shorter hair.
I'm not talking about cases where it wasn't clear, but where the
person has requested one thing and has obviously not received it,
then the salon's management should not expect the client to pay.
This sort of echos the return thread. It's not customary to display for fuschia 'cause he thinks it'll look better, I doubt any court
would order me to pay up. I'd say the same applies to a hairdresser
who is asked for a trim and decides that the client would look better
with shorter hair.
I'm not talking about cases where it wasn't clear, but where the
person has requested one thing and has obviously not received it,
then the salon's management should not expect the client to pay.
signs about no refunds in stores but should be if that's the policy, but
for hair salons maybe some satisfaction policy might be in order???
––
Cheers
Dennis
Remove 'Elle–Kabong' to reply