Home / alt.fashion / Wednesday, October 20, 2004
"Mme. Remy" <mmer...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Ifzdd.2533$5i5.1...@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
On the subject of the high waisted pants...my man was looking over my
shoulder as I was leafing through said Lucky mag., took a gander at the high
waisted pants pictured and said " I feel sorry for the poor woman who buys
those because she sees them here and thinks they're in fashion. They're
horrible!" Ha ha!
I know that some afers like high waisted jeans, but those pants are truly
laughable. They were up to the model's boobs! Yeah, they might make legs
look longer, but the look as a whole doesn't work (imho). Don't do it!
Ami
"ok2bwild" <ok2bw...@yahooTROUBLE.com> wrote in message
news:2tprcpF21ivc...@uni–berlin.de...
On Topic/ The Fugly Site
"Mme. Remy" <mmer...@gmail.com>
10/20/2004 7:45:44 PM
This has been the "topic de jour" on MUA's Cafe board. It's a blog where two
women rant about various fashion don'ts. It's hilarious. And also cruel.
However, I've been known to be just as cruel so I'm in no place to judge. If
you find this sort of thing funny, take a look here:
http://fuggingitup.blogspot.com/ This section (about Vanessa Paradis) made
me howl with laughter:
"And, of course, the crowning glory: the white shoes. I firmly believe that
unless you are a bride, a nurse, or Nancy Sinatra, you should not be wearing
white shoes. And you really should not be wearing them in October. And you
really, really should not be wearing them with black tights. Clearly a sign
of mental instability. (And yes, I know that contrasting tights and shoes
are chic this year, but I cling to the notion that when Vogue advocates such
a look, Vogue means, say, black tights and burgundy shoes. Or even brown
tights and pink shoes. But not the tragic black tights and horrifying white
shoes. Because, Anna Wintour, that is a path down which I will not follow
you. I'm sorry. No. No, I just can't. Stop bothering me. No. Seriously. And
while we're at it, the high–waisted pants? Not going to happen. And tell Kim
France at Lucky that I'm not buying them from her either, next time you see
her in the caf at Conde Nast.)"
women rant about various fashion don'ts. It's hilarious. And also cruel.
However, I've been known to be just as cruel so I'm in no place to judge. If
you find this sort of thing funny, take a look here:
http://fuggingitup.blogspot.com/ This section (about Vanessa Paradis) made
me howl with laughter:
"And, of course, the crowning glory: the white shoes. I firmly believe that
unless you are a bride, a nurse, or Nancy Sinatra, you should not be wearing
white shoes. And you really should not be wearing them in October. And you
really, really should not be wearing them with black tights. Clearly a sign
of mental instability. (And yes, I know that contrasting tights and shoes
are chic this year, but I cling to the notion that when Vogue advocates such
a look, Vogue means, say, black tights and burgundy shoes. Or even brown
tights and pink shoes. But not the tragic black tights and horrifying white
shoes. Because, Anna Wintour, that is a path down which I will not follow
you. I'm sorry. No. No, I just can't. Stop bothering me. No. Seriously. And
while we're at it, the high–waisted pants? Not going to happen. And tell Kim
France at Lucky that I'm not buying them from her either, next time you see
her in the caf at Conde Nast.)"
"Sophie" <Sop...@fakeaddress.com>
10/20/2004 4:56:20 PM
This has been the "topic de jour" on MUA's Cafe board. It's a blog where
two
women rant about various fashion don'ts. It's hilarious. And also cruel.
However, I've been known to be just as cruel so I'm in no place to judge.
IfHowever, I've been known to be just as cruel so I'm in no place to judge.
you find this sort of thing funny, take a look here:
http://fuggingitup.blogspot.com/ This section (about Vanessa Paradis) made
me howl with laughter:
"And, of course, the crowning glory: the white shoes. I firmly believe
thathttp://fuggingitup.blogspot.com/ This section (about Vanessa Paradis) made
me howl with laughter:
"And, of course, the crowning glory: the white shoes. I firmly believe
unless you are a bride, a nurse, or Nancy Sinatra, you should not be
wearing
white shoes. And you really should not be wearing them in October. And you
really, really should not be wearing them with black tights. Clearly a
signreally, really should not be wearing them with black tights. Clearly a
of mental instability. (And yes, I know that contrasting tights and shoes
are chic this year, but I cling to the notion that when Vogue advocates
suchare chic this year, but I cling to the notion that when Vogue advocates
a look, Vogue means, say, black tights and burgundy shoes. Or even brown
tights and pink shoes. But not the tragic black tights and horrifying
whitetights and pink shoes. But not the tragic black tights and horrifying
shoes. Because, Anna Wintour, that is a path down which I will not follow
you. I'm sorry. No. No, I just can't. Stop bothering me. No. Seriously.
Andyou. I'm sorry. No. No, I just can't. Stop bothering me. No. Seriously.
while we're at it, the high–waisted pants? Not going to happen. And tell
Kim
France at Lucky that I'm not buying them from her either, next time you
see
her in the caf at Conde Nast.)"
I thought this was going to be about Keira Knightley's awful new 'do – lol. "Ami" <amia...@nac.net>
10/20/2004 6:15:33 PM
"Mme. Remy" <mmer...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Ifzdd.2533$5i5.1...@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
This has been the "topic de jour" on MUA's Cafe board. It's a blog where
two women rant about various fashion don'ts. It's hilarious. And also
cruel. However, I've been known to be just as cruel so I'm in no place to
judge. If you find this sort of thing funny, take a look here:
http://fuggingitup.blogspot.com/ This section (about Vanessa Paradis) made
me howl with laughter:
"And, of course, the crowning glory: the white shoes. I firmly believe
that unless you are a bride, a nurse, or Nancy Sinatra, you should not be
wearing white shoes. And you really should not be wearing them in October.
And you really, really should not be wearing them with black tights.
Clearly a sign of mental instability. (And yes, I know that contrasting
tights and shoes are chic this year, but I cling to the notion that when
Vogue advocates such a look, Vogue means, say, black tights and burgundy
shoes. Or even brown tights and pink shoes. But not the tragic black
tights and horrifying white shoes. Because, Anna Wintour, that is a path
down which I will not follow you. I'm sorry. No. No, I just can't. Stop
bothering me. No. Seriously. And while we're at it, the high–waisted
pants? Not going to happen. And tell Kim France at Lucky that I'm not
buying them from her either, next time you see her in the caf at Conde
Nast.)"
Too funny, I'll have to check it out. two women rant about various fashion don'ts. It's hilarious. And also
cruel. However, I've been known to be just as cruel so I'm in no place to
judge. If you find this sort of thing funny, take a look here:
http://fuggingitup.blogspot.com/ This section (about Vanessa Paradis) made
me howl with laughter:
"And, of course, the crowning glory: the white shoes. I firmly believe
that unless you are a bride, a nurse, or Nancy Sinatra, you should not be
wearing white shoes. And you really should not be wearing them in October.
And you really, really should not be wearing them with black tights.
Clearly a sign of mental instability. (And yes, I know that contrasting
tights and shoes are chic this year, but I cling to the notion that when
Vogue advocates such a look, Vogue means, say, black tights and burgundy
shoes. Or even brown tights and pink shoes. But not the tragic black
tights and horrifying white shoes. Because, Anna Wintour, that is a path
down which I will not follow you. I'm sorry. No. No, I just can't. Stop
bothering me. No. Seriously. And while we're at it, the high–waisted
pants? Not going to happen. And tell Kim France at Lucky that I'm not
buying them from her either, next time you see her in the caf at Conde
Nast.)"
On the subject of the high waisted pants...my man was looking over my
shoulder as I was leafing through said Lucky mag., took a gander at the high
waisted pants pictured and said " I feel sorry for the poor woman who buys
those because she sees them here and thinks they're in fashion. They're
horrible!" Ha ha!
I know that some afers like high waisted jeans, but those pants are truly
laughable. They were up to the model's boobs! Yeah, they might make legs
look longer, but the look as a whole doesn't work (imho). Don't do it!
Ami
Katie <sphyrapi...@fakeaddress.com>
10/21/2004 2:03:47 AM
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:45:44 GMT, "Mme. Remy" <mmer...@gmail.com>
wrote:
That's hilarious – thanks for posting it. I especially liked the
picture of JC Chasez and the comment that "if you put him in shorts,
glasses, dyed his hair blue, and had him strategically shaved", he'd
be Milhouse from the Simpsons. ROTFLMAO.
Katie
wrote:
This has been the "topic de jour" on MUA's Cafe board. It's a blog where two
women rant about various fashion don'ts. It's hilarious. And also cruel.
However, I've been known to be just as cruel so I'm in no place to judge. If
you find this sort of thing funny, take a look here:
http://fuggingitup.blogspot.com/ This section (about Vanessa Paradis) made
me howl with laughter:
<snip>women rant about various fashion don'ts. It's hilarious. And also cruel.
However, I've been known to be just as cruel so I'm in no place to judge. If
you find this sort of thing funny, take a look here:
http://fuggingitup.blogspot.com/ This section (about Vanessa Paradis) made
me howl with laughter:
That's hilarious – thanks for posting it. I especially liked the
picture of JC Chasez and the comment that "if you put him in shorts,
glasses, dyed his hair blue, and had him strategically shaved", he'd
be Milhouse from the Simpsons. ROTFLMAO.
Katie
jshe...@aol.comxoxo (Heather and Joe)
10/21/2004 2:07:27 AM
I've been reading and laughing since I saw the post. Some of those (esp the
jabs at Britney, the "Peldens" and Maggie) are priceless!
The Jennifer Lopez entry was by and far, the best though.
Heather
jabs at Britney, the "Peldens" and Maggie) are priceless!
The Jennifer Lopez entry was by and far, the best though.
Heather
"Ami" <amia...@nac.net>
10/21/2004 11:17:30 AM
"ok2bwild" <ok2bw...@yahooTROUBLE.com> wrote in message
news:2tprcpF21ivc...@uni–berlin.de...
Chloe Sevigny. dear god i am laughing so hard
thanks for the laugh(s) before 9am!
"Mme. Remy" <mmer...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Ifzdd.2533$5i5.1...@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
thanks for the laugh(s) before 9am!
"Mme. Remy" <mmer...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Ifzdd.2533$5i5.1...@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
triannadun...@hotmail.com (TdN)
10/21/2004 4:03:35 PM
"Ami" <amia...@nac.net> wrote in message news:<4177d308$...@nntp2.nac.net>...
T.
I always thought fugly meant fat and ugly, but their usage of fugly as
frightfully ugly is much better!
"Fugly" is a contraction of "fucking ugly". But "frightfully" is more refined. frightfully ugly is much better!
T.
"ok2bwild" <ok2bw...@yahooTROUBLE.com>
10/21/2004 8:08:58 AM
very funny site..lol...i liked the pic of lenny kravitz and prince charles
LOL...
"Mme. Remy" <mmer...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Ifzdd.2533$5i5.1...@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
LOL...
"Mme. Remy" <mmer...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Ifzdd.2533$5i5.1...@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
This has been the "topic de jour" on MUA's Cafe board. It's a blog where
two women rant about various fashion don'ts. It's hilarious. And also
cruel. However, I've been known to be just as cruel so I'm in no place to
judge. If you find this sort of thing funny, take a look here:
http://fuggingitup.blogspot.com/ This section (about Vanessa Paradis) made
me howl with laughter:
"And, of course, the crowning glory: the white shoes. I firmly believe
that unless you are a bride, a nurse, or Nancy Sinatra, you should not be
wearing white shoes. And you really should not be wearing them in October.
And you really, really should not be wearing them with black tights.
Clearly a sign of mental instability. (And yes, I know that contrasting
tights and shoes are chic this year, but I cling to the notion that when
Vogue advocates such a look, Vogue means, say, black tights and burgundy
shoes. Or even brown tights and pink shoes. But not the tragic black
tights and horrifying white shoes. Because, Anna Wintour, that is a path
down which I will not follow you. I'm sorry. No. No, I just can't. Stop
bothering me. No. Seriously. And while we're at it, the high–waisted
pants? Not going to happen. And tell Kim France at Lucky that I'm not
buying them from her either, next time you see her in the caf at Conde
Nast.)"
two women rant about various fashion don'ts. It's hilarious. And also
cruel. However, I've been known to be just as cruel so I'm in no place to
judge. If you find this sort of thing funny, take a look here:
http://fuggingitup.blogspot.com/ This section (about Vanessa Paradis) made
me howl with laughter:
"And, of course, the crowning glory: the white shoes. I firmly believe
that unless you are a bride, a nurse, or Nancy Sinatra, you should not be
wearing white shoes. And you really should not be wearing them in October.
And you really, really should not be wearing them with black tights.
Clearly a sign of mental instability. (And yes, I know that contrasting
tights and shoes are chic this year, but I cling to the notion that when
Vogue advocates such a look, Vogue means, say, black tights and burgundy
shoes. Or even brown tights and pink shoes. But not the tragic black
tights and horrifying white shoes. Because, Anna Wintour, that is a path
down which I will not follow you. I'm sorry. No. No, I just can't. Stop
bothering me. No. Seriously. And while we're at it, the high–waisted
pants? Not going to happen. And tell Kim France at Lucky that I'm not
buying them from her either, next time you see her in the caf at Conde
Nast.)"
"ok2bwild" <ok2bw...@yahooTROUBLE.com>
10/21/2004 8:20:24 AM
Chloe Sevigny. dear god i am laughing so hard
thanks for the laugh(s) before 9am!
"Mme. Remy" <mmer...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Ifzdd.2533$5i5.1...@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
thanks for the laugh(s) before 9am!
"Mme. Remy" <mmer...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Ifzdd.2533$5i5.1...@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
This has been the "topic de jour" on MUA's Cafe board. It's a blog where
two women rant about various fashion don'ts. It's hilarious. And also
cruel. However, I've been known to be just as cruel so I'm in no place to
judge. If you find this sort of thing funny, take a look here:
http://fuggingitup.blogspot.com/ This section (about Vanessa Paradis) made
me howl with laughter:
"And, of course, the crowning glory: the white shoes. I firmly believe
that unless you are a bride, a nurse, or Nancy Sinatra, you should not be
wearing white shoes. And you really should not be wearing them in October.
And you really, really should not be wearing them with black tights.
Clearly a sign of mental instability. (And yes, I know that contrasting
tights and shoes are chic this year, but I cling to the notion that when
Vogue advocates such a look, Vogue means, say, black tights and burgundy
shoes. Or even brown tights and pink shoes. But not the tragic black
tights and horrifying white shoes. Because, Anna Wintour, that is a path
down which I will not follow you. I'm sorry. No. No, I just can't. Stop
bothering me. No. Seriously. And while we're at it, the high–waisted
pants? Not going to happen. And tell Kim France at Lucky that I'm not
buying them from her either, next time you see her in the caf at Conde
Nast.)"
two women rant about various fashion don'ts. It's hilarious. And also
cruel. However, I've been known to be just as cruel so I'm in no place to
judge. If you find this sort of thing funny, take a look here:
http://fuggingitup.blogspot.com/ This section (about Vanessa Paradis) made
me howl with laughter:
"And, of course, the crowning glory: the white shoes. I firmly believe
that unless you are a bride, a nurse, or Nancy Sinatra, you should not be
wearing white shoes. And you really should not be wearing them in October.
And you really, really should not be wearing them with black tights.
Clearly a sign of mental instability. (And yes, I know that contrasting
tights and shoes are chic this year, but I cling to the notion that when
Vogue advocates such a look, Vogue means, say, black tights and burgundy
shoes. Or even brown tights and pink shoes. But not the tragic black
tights and horrifying white shoes. Because, Anna Wintour, that is a path
down which I will not follow you. I'm sorry. No. No, I just can't. Stop
bothering me. No. Seriously. And while we're at it, the high–waisted
pants? Not going to happen. And tell Kim France at Lucky that I'm not
buying them from her either, next time you see her in the caf at Conde
Nast.)"
Richard Hunter <returntosen...@ddressunknown.com>
10/21/2004 9:20:31 PM
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:17:30 –0400, "Ami" <amia...@nac.net>
coughed and sputtered, and managed to choke out these words:
'ugly.'
david
––
"Being lectured by the President on fiscal responsibility
is a little bit like Tony Soprano talking to me about law
and order in this country." –John Kerry
coughed and sputtered, and managed to choke out these words:
I always thought fugly meant fat and ugly, but their usage of fugly as
frightfully ugly is much better!
when i was in middle school, it was the combo of 'f*cking' and frightfully ugly is much better!
'ugly.'
david
––
"Being lectured by the President on fiscal responsibility
is a little bit like Tony Soprano talking to me about law
and order in this country." –John Kerry
j <no.lon...@mindspring.com>
10/21/2004 9:32:17 PM
In article <4177d308$...@nntp2.nac.net>, Ami <amia...@nac.net> wrote:
"ok2bwild" <ok2bw...@yahooTROUBLE.com> wrote in message
news:2tprcpF21ivc...@uni–berlin.de...
"ok2bwild" <ok2bw...@yahooTROUBLE.com> wrote in message
news:2tprcpF21ivc...@uni–berlin.de...
"Team America: World Spanglies" <spangliek...@netscape.net>
10/21/2004 9:40:45 PM
"Richard Hunter" <returntosen...@ddressunknown.com> wrote:
when i was in middle school, it was the combo of 'f*cking' and
described as meaning anything different. But people *NEVER* call me that, so
I guess I'm entirely exempt from having a say–so this conversation, aren't
I? I'm the opposite. I'm fubbeautiful.
;–) <wink>
JN
when i was in middle school, it was the combo of 'f*cking' and
'ugly.'
david
––
"Being lectured by the President on fiscal responsibility
is a little bit like Tony Soprano talking to me about law
and order in this country." –John Kerry
Yeah, I've always heard it means fu**ing ugly, too. I've never heard it david
––
"Being lectured by the President on fiscal responsibility
is a little bit like Tony Soprano talking to me about law
and order in this country." –John Kerry
described as meaning anything different. But people *NEVER* call me that, so
I guess I'm entirely exempt from having a say–so this conversation, aren't
I? I'm the opposite. I'm fubbeautiful.
;–) <wink>
JN