Home / alt.fashion / Thursday, August 28, 2003
What the hell is wrong with Revlon, anyway? Why isn't it doing better,
considering that they have so many products that are wonderful, like the
Colorstay Stay Natural? Who is asleep at the switch within the corporation???
IMHO, all they need to do is bring back Color Lock and they'd be back in
business. They were so stoopid to discontinue this product, the very best e/s
base ever produced.
EMiriamD
"No fashion is ever a success unless it is used as a form of seduction."
–– Christian Dior
mixed into the product like benefit's brow zings.
Great products. Both discontinued.
––MS_Mac_OE_3145017230_810132_MIME_Part
Content–type: text/plain; charset="ISO–8859–1"
Content–transfer–encoding: 8bit
Geez, how about this for making more sales to save your drowning in debt
company? How about making cosmetics that look the same way they look in the
container? How about mascaras that really work rather than coming out with a
new one every month? I find Relvon to be the #1 culprit of this. Nothing
EVER looks on the way you see it.... a waste of $$.
Elke
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
–––––––––––––––––––––
E. Von Freudenberg, Editor
The Beauty Newsletter
"It's Beauty in Your Email." http://www.beautynewsletter.gq.nu
Get the latest beauty news, reviews, makeup tips, new websites and more
from a top celebrity makeup artist. Because if you don't know how to apply
your makeup, no product is going to make you look as if you do.
SUBSCRIBE:mailto:BeautyNewsletter–subscr...@yahoogroups.com
NEW Makeup eBook! at <http://www.beautynewsletter.gq.nu/ebook>
––MS_Mac_OE_3145017230_810132_MIME_Part
Content–type: text/html; charset="ISO–8859–1"
Content–transfer–encoding: quoted–printable
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: NEWS: Revlon Running Near Empty</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
Geez, how about this for making more sales to save your drowning in debt co=
mpany? How about making cosmetics that look the same way they look in the co=
ntainer? How about mascaras that really work rather than coming out with a n=
ew one every month? I find Relvon to be the #1 culprit of this. Nothin=
g EVER looks on the way you see it.... a waste of $$.<BR>
<BR>
Elke<BR>
<FONT COLOR=3D"#F06157">–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––=
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––<BR>
E. Von Freudenberg, Editor<BR>
<B>The Beauty Newsletter=81<BR>
<I>"It's Beauty in Your Email."=81 </I></B>http://www.beautynewslet=
ter.gq.nu<BR>
Get the latest beauty news, reviews, makeup tips, new websites =
and more <BR>
from a top celebrity makeup artist. Because if you don't know how to apply =
<BR>
your makeup, no product is going to make you look as if you do. <BR>
<B>SUBSCRIBE</B>:mailto:BeautyNewsletter–subscr...@yahoogroups.com <BR>
<B>NEW</B> <B>Makeup eBook!</B> at <http://www.beautynewsletter.gq.nu/eb=
ook></FONT> <BR>
<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>
––MS_Mac_OE_3145017230_810132_MIME_Part––
Noooooooooooooooooo.
this reorganization might get them to keep the products that actually sell
instead of discontinuing them.
I have to wonder how these companies do their consumer research.
––
Julie P.
"Being nobody but yourself in a world which is doing its best, night and day,
to make you like everybody else means to fight the hardest battle any human can
fight." ––e.e. cummings
After they yanked my favorite brow makeup––and the only comparable product was
Benefit's $26. brow zings––I swore eternal vigilance.
Re: NEWS: Revlon Running Near Empty
ManualIns...@DB.com
8/28/2003 10:16:17 PM
maladic...@aol.com (Maladicta1)
8/28/2003 11:16:17 PM
Nooooooooooooooooooooo.
.. No more Colorstay Natural foundation, Colorstay nail polish, Rose and Nude
Velvet lipsticks, and the Moisturous line.
Time to stock up.
.. No more Colorstay Natural foundation, Colorstay nail polish, Rose and Nude
Velvet lipsticks, and the Moisturous line.
Time to stock up.
emiri...@aol.com (EMiriamD)
8/29/2003 2:21:53 PM
No more Colorstay Natural foundation,
NOOOOOOOOOO! I am gonna stock up today! What the hell is wrong with Revlon, anyway? Why isn't it doing better,
considering that they have so many products that are wonderful, like the
Colorstay Stay Natural? Who is asleep at the switch within the corporation???
IMHO, all they need to do is bring back Color Lock and they'd be back in
business. They were so stoopid to discontinue this product, the very best e/s
base ever produced.
EMiriamD
"No fashion is ever a success unless it is used as a form of seduction."
–– Christian Dior
maladic...@aol.com (Maladicta1)
8/29/2003 2:58:23 PM
IMHO, all they need to do is bring back Color Lock and they'd be back in
business. They were so stoopid to discontinue this product, the very best
e/s
base ever produced.
EMiriamD
"No fashion is ever a success unless it is used as a form of seduction."
–– Christian Dior
They've had two brow wax products––one with the wax on the side, one with it business. They were so stoopid to discontinue this product, the very best
e/s
base ever produced.
EMiriamD
"No fashion is ever a success unless it is used as a form of seduction."
–– Christian Dior
mixed into the product like benefit's brow zings.
Great products. Both discontinued.
Laurie0512 <laurie0...@earthlink.net>
8/29/2003 10:12:08 AM
ACK! I will have to stock up on the Colorstay nailpolish, at least the
Sheer Camisole shade! It has spoiled me. Other polish chips in a couple of
days, but this lasts a week with no chips.
Laurie
Sheer Camisole shade! It has spoiled me. Other polish chips in a couple of
days, but this lasts a week with no chips.
Laurie
AnaisM...@AOL.com (Product Princess)
8/29/2003 8:10:10 AM
I saw that article in the NY Times. According to the report, Revlon
is pretty close in filing for Chapter 11.
Shame. Revlon was the first make–up I purchased.
Tess
is pretty close in filing for Chapter 11.
Shame. Revlon was the first make–up I purchased.
Tess
Charles Perrin <c.l.perrin...@att.net>
8/29/2003 8:15:09 PM
On 29 Aug 2003 08:10:10 –0700, Product Princess wrote:
What you don't want is Chapter 7 (shutting down the business). Chapter
11 (reorganizing the business) may very well be a good thing for
everyone except the stockholders.
I saw that article in the NY Times. According to the report,
Revlon is pretty close in filing for Chapter 11.
Chapter 11 is not Chapter 7. Revlon is pretty close in filing for Chapter 11.
What you don't want is Chapter 7 (shutting down the business). Chapter
11 (reorganizing the business) may very well be a good thing for
everyone except the stockholders.
"[ from Elke ] Von Freudenberg Enterprises" <freudenb...@prodigy.net>
8/29/2003 10:54:19 PM
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ––MS_Mac_OE_3145017230_810132_MIME_Part
Content–type: text/plain; charset="ISO–8859–1"
Content–transfer–encoding: 8bit
Geez, how about this for making more sales to save your drowning in debt
company? How about making cosmetics that look the same way they look in the
container? How about mascaras that really work rather than coming out with a
new one every month? I find Relvon to be the #1 culprit of this. Nothing
EVER looks on the way you see it.... a waste of $$.
Elke
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
–––––––––––––––––––––
E. Von Freudenberg, Editor
The Beauty Newsletter
"It's Beauty in Your Email." http://www.beautynewsletter.gq.nu
Get the latest beauty news, reviews, makeup tips, new websites and more
from a top celebrity makeup artist. Because if you don't know how to apply
your makeup, no product is going to make you look as if you do.
SUBSCRIBE:mailto:BeautyNewsletter–subscr...@yahoogroups.com
NEW Makeup eBook! at <http://www.beautynewsletter.gq.nu/ebook>
––MS_Mac_OE_3145017230_810132_MIME_Part
Content–type: text/html; charset="ISO–8859–1"
Content–transfer–encoding: quoted–printable
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: NEWS: Revlon Running Near Empty</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
Geez, how about this for making more sales to save your drowning in debt co=
mpany? How about making cosmetics that look the same way they look in the co=
ntainer? How about mascaras that really work rather than coming out with a n=
ew one every month? I find Relvon to be the #1 culprit of this. Nothin=
g EVER looks on the way you see it.... a waste of $$.<BR>
<BR>
Elke<BR>
<FONT COLOR=3D"#F06157">–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––=
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––<BR>
E. Von Freudenberg, Editor<BR>
<B>The Beauty Newsletter=81<BR>
<I>"It's Beauty in Your Email."=81 </I></B>http://www.beautynewslet=
ter.gq.nu<BR>
Get the latest beauty news, reviews, makeup tips, new websites =
and more <BR>
from a top celebrity makeup artist. Because if you don't know how to apply =
<BR>
your makeup, no product is going to make you look as if you do. <BR>
<B>SUBSCRIBE</B>:mailto:BeautyNewsletter–subscr...@yahoogroups.com <BR>
<B>NEW</B> <B>Makeup eBook!</B> at <http://www.beautynewsletter.gq.nu/eb=
ook></FONT> <BR>
<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>
––MS_Mac_OE_3145017230_810132_MIME_Part––
jjjjju...@aol.comehither (Jjjjjulie)
8/29/2003 10:58:37 PM
But isn't Chapter 11 merely a chance to reorganize and to stave off creditors?
It might be a very smart business move.
I doubt Revlon is going to go away.
––
Julie P.
"Being nobody but yourself in a world which is doing its best, night and day,
to make you like everybody else means to fight the hardest battle any human can
fight." ––e.e. cummings
It might be a very smart business move.
I doubt Revlon is going to go away.
––
Julie P.
"Being nobody but yourself in a world which is doing its best, night and day,
to make you like everybody else means to fight the hardest battle any human can
fight." ––e.e. cummings
maladic...@aol.com (Maladicta1)
8/29/2003 11:39:16 PM
But isn't Chapter 11 merely a chance to reorganize and to stave off
creditors?
It might be a very smart business move.
I doubt Revlon is going to go away.
––
Julie P.
"Being nobody but yourself in a world which is doing its best, night and day,
to make you like everybody else means to fight the hardest battle any human
can
fight." ––e.e. cummings
Re–organize= pare down product line. creditors?
It might be a very smart business move.
I doubt Revlon is going to go away.
––
Julie P.
"Being nobody but yourself in a world which is doing its best, night and day,
to make you like everybody else means to fight the hardest battle any human
can
fight." ––e.e. cummings
Noooooooooooooooooo.
jjjjju...@aol.comehither (Jjjjjulie)
8/29/2003 11:43:56 PM
From: maladic...@aol.com (Maladicta1)
Re–organize= pare down product line.
Noooooooooooooooooo.
Ahahaha! But certainly there are one or two items they could get rid of? And Noooooooooooooooooo.
this reorganization might get them to keep the products that actually sell
instead of discontinuing them.
I have to wonder how these companies do their consumer research.
––
Julie P.
"Being nobody but yourself in a world which is doing its best, night and day,
to make you like everybody else means to fight the hardest battle any human can
fight." ––e.e. cummings
maladic...@aol.com (Maladicta1)
8/29/2003 11:59:43 PM
Ahahaha! But certainly there are one or two items they could get rid of?
With my luck, Julie, it will be Colorstay Nailpolish and the Wet and Dry quads. After they yanked my favorite brow makeup––and the only comparable product was
Benefit's $26. brow zings––I swore eternal vigilance.
"melizabeth" <chris1...@btopenworld.com>
8/30/2003 1:01:34 AM
It could be that some do, but...as I have learned, it doesn't matter what
the little people think, just what admin wants. Cynical, but in some cases
true.
I would hope that they would look at AF and I agree, Julie, not as spam,
just as grassroots research. But that would make sense. Hm.
––
M~Elizabeth
To thine own self be true
"Jjjjjulie" <jjjjju...@aol.comehither> wrote in message
news:20030829201816.20041.00000...@mb–m28.aol.com...
With my luck, Julie, it will be Colorstay Nailpolish and the Wet and Dry
quads.
After they yanked my favorite brow makeup––and the only comparable
product
was
Benefit's $26. brow zings––I swore eternal vigilance.
the little people think, just what admin wants. Cynical, but in some cases
true.
I would hope that they would look at AF and I agree, Julie, not as spam,
just as grassroots research. But that would make sense. Hm.
––
M~Elizabeth
To thine own self be true
"Jjjjjulie" <jjjjju...@aol.comehither> wrote in message
news:20030829201816.20041.00000...@mb–m28.aol.com...
Ahahaha! But certainly there are one or two items they could get rid
of?With my luck, Julie, it will be Colorstay Nailpolish and the Wet and Dry
quads.
After they yanked my favorite brow makeup––and the only comparable
product
was
Benefit's $26. brow zings––I swore eternal vigilance.
Do you think the jinx would be averted if you suddenly decided you hated
both
of those products (I like the CS nail polish too, and a bunch of other
Revlon
products I guess I'm going to start pretending I don't like so they won't
be
discontinued during the reorganization)? ;–)
I grow more and more amazed, as the world become more and more
internet/computer literate, that large cosmetic companies don't tap into
richI grow more and more amazed, as the world become more and more
internet/computer literate, that large cosmetic companies don't tap into
resources like alt.fashion. I don't mean to spam us or to pitch ideas to
us,
but to just read consumer likes and dislikes.
––
Julie P.
"Being nobody but yourself in a world which is doing its best, night and
day,––
Julie P.
"Being nobody but yourself in a world which is doing its best, night and
to make you like everybody else means to fight the hardest battle any
human can
fight." ––e.e. cummings
"Stephanie K." <corio...@shore.net>
8/30/2003 10:20:26 AM
x–no–archive: yes
I've been in front of Revlon countless times since 1996 –– about every
six months for one reason or another. Despite the new CEO and pals (all
from Coca–Cola), I have not seen any change in the entrenched corporate
culture (old guard fiefdoms rule!). I have heard a lot of lofty yet
empty promises (talk is cheap, promised R&D venture $ never
materializes) and have seen several young, forward thinking managers
leave for greener pastures while the old guard remains only to
perpetuate the same old same old. IMHO, Revlon's problems start with
exceptionally poor business process and an attitude of false
superiority, which snowballs into a paralyzing inability to change. My
first meeting with Revlon was the first time I encountered the "not
invented here syndrome." Before then, I thought it was a tired, old,
irrelevant cliche. Not so! It's alive and thriving at Revlon. If looks
could kill, I never would have made it out the door alive! I recall once
asking about the celebrity deals and was told they did get rid of them
at one point but all the industry insiders thought it was a bad move so
back they came, waving their big paychecks. Hmmm, are these the same
insiders who endorsed Revlon's ill–advised foray in to "cosmetic
vitamins" I wonder? As for Chapter 11, recall MacAndrews & Forbes is
wholly owned by Ronald O. Perelman, and I doubt Ron–O took a
suboridinated position which simply means, to hell with everyone else ––
shareholders, employees, suppliers, consumers –– just protect Ron's
money. What is odd to me is how Almay can make money but Revlon can't.
Why don't they follow Almay's process/model? All I can say now is
suppliers will just bypass Revlon all together and thank God I never
wrote any business with them 'cuz I'd be...@t outta luck! Rant over!
–sk
Jjjjjulie wrote:
From: maladic...@aol.com (Maladicta1)
I've been in front of Revlon countless times since 1996 –– about every
six months for one reason or another. Despite the new CEO and pals (all
from Coca–Cola), I have not seen any change in the entrenched corporate
culture (old guard fiefdoms rule!). I have heard a lot of lofty yet
empty promises (talk is cheap, promised R&D venture $ never
materializes) and have seen several young, forward thinking managers
leave for greener pastures while the old guard remains only to
perpetuate the same old same old. IMHO, Revlon's problems start with
exceptionally poor business process and an attitude of false
superiority, which snowballs into a paralyzing inability to change. My
first meeting with Revlon was the first time I encountered the "not
invented here syndrome." Before then, I thought it was a tired, old,
irrelevant cliche. Not so! It's alive and thriving at Revlon. If looks
could kill, I never would have made it out the door alive! I recall once
asking about the celebrity deals and was told they did get rid of them
at one point but all the industry insiders thought it was a bad move so
back they came, waving their big paychecks. Hmmm, are these the same
insiders who endorsed Revlon's ill–advised foray in to "cosmetic
vitamins" I wonder? As for Chapter 11, recall MacAndrews & Forbes is
wholly owned by Ronald O. Perelman, and I doubt Ron–O took a
suboridinated position which simply means, to hell with everyone else ––
shareholders, employees, suppliers, consumers –– just protect Ron's
money. What is odd to me is how Almay can make money but Revlon can't.
Why don't they follow Almay's process/model? All I can say now is
suppliers will just bypass Revlon all together and thank God I never
wrote any business with them 'cuz I'd be...@t outta luck! Rant over!
–sk
Jjjjjulie wrote:
From: maladic...@aol.com (Maladicta1)
Ahahaha! But certainly there are one or two items they could get rid of?
Do you think the jinx would be averted if you suddenly decided you hated both
of those products (I like the CS nail polish too, and a bunch of other Revlon
products I guess I'm going to start pretending I don't like so they won't be
discontinued during the reorganization)? ;–)
I grow more and more amazed, as the world become more and more
internet/computer literate, that large cosmetic companies don't tap into rich
resources like alt.fashion. I don't mean to spam us or to pitch ideas to us,
but to just read consumer likes and dislikes.
––
Julie P.
"Being nobody but yourself in a world which is doing its best, night and day,
to make you like everybody else means to fight the hardest battle any human can
fight." ––e.e. cummings
Do you think the jinx would be averted if you suddenly decided you hated both
of those products (I like the CS nail polish too, and a bunch of other Revlon
products I guess I'm going to start pretending I don't like so they won't be
discontinued during the reorganization)? ;–)
I grow more and more amazed, as the world become more and more
internet/computer literate, that large cosmetic companies don't tap into rich
resources like alt.fashion. I don't mean to spam us or to pitch ideas to us,
but to just read consumer likes and dislikes.
––
Julie P.
"Being nobody but yourself in a world which is doing its best, night and day,
to make you like everybody else means to fight the hardest battle any human can
fight." ––e.e. cummings
Leigh Melton <le...@nbi.com>
8/30/2003 2:22:50 AM
On 29 Aug 2003 23:43:56 GMT, jjjjju...@aol.comehither (Jjjjjulie)
wrote:
endorsements. I don't care if Halle Berry looks good with Revlon
polish on her nails, what I care about is how it goes on, how long it
lasts and the shades available to me.
Halle Berry would probably look good with refrigerator touch–up paint
on her nails. *I* am the one who needs help. =)
Leigh
––
Consequences, shmonsequences, as long as I'm rich. – D. Duck
wrote:
Ahahaha! But certainly there are one or two items they could get rid of?
I think one item they could toss are the expensive celebrity endorsements. I don't care if Halle Berry looks good with Revlon
polish on her nails, what I care about is how it goes on, how long it
lasts and the shades available to me.
Halle Berry would probably look good with refrigerator touch–up paint
on her nails. *I* am the one who needs help. =)
Leigh
––
Consequences, shmonsequences, as long as I'm rich. – D. Duck
Charles Perrin <c.l.perrin...@att.net>
8/30/2003 2:15:20 AM
On 29 Aug 2003 23:39:16 GMT, Maladicta1 wrote when Jjjjjulie first
commented:
But isn't Chapter 11 merely a chance to reorganize and to stave off
creditors?
It might be a very smart business move.
Only one question: wonder how many of the "pared down" employees will
keep buying Revlon? :–(
commented:
But isn't Chapter 11 merely a chance to reorganize and to stave off
creditors?
It might be a very smart business move.
Re–organize= pare down product line.
Re–organize = pare down employees and excess facilities. Only one question: wonder how many of the "pared down" employees will
keep buying Revlon? :–(
ramblingn...@hotmail.com (Charli)
8/30/2003 2:11:00 AM
Charles Perrin <c.l.perrin...@att.net> wrote in message news:<k020lvsq4bo4oglhl6gufgklg4b4lch...@4ax.com>...
the Revlon website :–((
charli
On 29 Aug 2003 23:39:16 GMT, Maladicta1 wrote when Jjjjjulie first
commented:
But isn't Chapter 11 merely a chance to reorganize and to stave off
creditors?
It might be a very smart business move.
Re–organize = pare down employees and excess facilities.
Only one question: wonder how many of the "pared down" employees will
keep buying Revlon? :–(
One of the pared down employees must be the webmaster. I can't pull up commented:
But isn't Chapter 11 merely a chance to reorganize and to stave off
creditors?
It might be a very smart business move.
Re–organize = pare down employees and excess facilities.
Only one question: wonder how many of the "pared down" employees will
keep buying Revlon? :–(
the Revlon website :–((
charli
maladic...@aol.com (Maladicta1)
8/31/2003 3:33:15 PM
x–no–archive: yes
I've been in front of Revlon countless times since 1996 –– about every
six months for one reason or another. Despite the new CEO and pals (all
from Coca–Cola), I have not seen any change in the entrenched corporate
culture (old guard fiefdoms rule!). I have heard a lot of lofty yet
empty promises (talk is cheap, promised R&D venture $ never
materializes) and have seen several young, forward thinking managers
leave for greener pastures while the old guard remains only to
perpetuate the same old same old. IMHO, Revlon's problems start with
exceptionally poor business process and an attitude of false
superiority, which snowballs into a paralyzing inability to change. My
first meeting with Revlon was the first time I encountered the "not
invented here syndrome." Before then, I thought it was a tired, old,
irrelevant cliche. Not so! It's alive and thriving at Revlon. If looks
could kill, I never would have made it out the door alive! I recall once
asking about the celebrity deals and was told they did get rid of them
at one point but all the industry insiders thought it was a bad move so
back they came, waving their big paychecks. Hmmm, are these the same
insiders who endorsed Revlon's ill–advised foray in to "cosmetic
vitamins" I wonder? As for Chapter 11, recall MacAndrews & Forbes is
wholly owned by Ronald O. Perelman, and I doubt Ron–O took a
suboridinated position which simply means, to hell with everyone else ––
shareholders, employees, suppliers, consumers –– just protect Ron's
money. What is odd to me is how Almay can make money but Revlon can't.
Why don't they follow Almay's process/model? All I can say now is
suppliers will just bypass Revlon all together and thank God I never
wrote any business with them 'cuz I'd be...@t outta luck! Rant over!
–sk
Jjjjjulie wrote:
From: maladic...@aol.com (Maladicta1)
both
Revlon
be
rich
us,
day,
can
I've been in front of Revlon countless times since 1996 –– about every
six months for one reason or another. Despite the new CEO and pals (all
from Coca–Cola), I have not seen any change in the entrenched corporate
culture (old guard fiefdoms rule!). I have heard a lot of lofty yet
empty promises (talk is cheap, promised R&D venture $ never
materializes) and have seen several young, forward thinking managers
leave for greener pastures while the old guard remains only to
perpetuate the same old same old. IMHO, Revlon's problems start with
exceptionally poor business process and an attitude of false
superiority, which snowballs into a paralyzing inability to change. My
first meeting with Revlon was the first time I encountered the "not
invented here syndrome." Before then, I thought it was a tired, old,
irrelevant cliche. Not so! It's alive and thriving at Revlon. If looks
could kill, I never would have made it out the door alive! I recall once
asking about the celebrity deals and was told they did get rid of them
at one point but all the industry insiders thought it was a bad move so
back they came, waving their big paychecks. Hmmm, are these the same
insiders who endorsed Revlon's ill–advised foray in to "cosmetic
vitamins" I wonder? As for Chapter 11, recall MacAndrews & Forbes is
wholly owned by Ronald O. Perelman, and I doubt Ron–O took a
suboridinated position which simply means, to hell with everyone else ––
shareholders, employees, suppliers, consumers –– just protect Ron's
money. What is odd to me is how Almay can make money but Revlon can't.
Why don't they follow Almay's process/model? All I can say now is
suppliers will just bypass Revlon all together and thank God I never
wrote any business with them 'cuz I'd be...@t outta luck! Rant over!
–sk
Jjjjjulie wrote:
From: maladic...@aol.com (Maladicta1)
both
Revlon
be
rich
us,
day,
can
"Sophie" <Sop...@fakeaddress.com>
8/30/2003 8:18:26 AM
This is a multi–part message in MIME format.
––––––=_NextPart_000_0156_01C36ECF.491E3D30
Content–Type: text/plain;
charset="iso–8859–1"
Content–Transfer–Encoding: quoted–printable
Re: NEWS: Revlon Running Near EmptyAnd how about not paying celebrities =
major $$$ to be "spokesmodels"? Put the money towards the products.
"[ from Elke ] Von Freudenberg Enterprises" <freudenb...@prodigy.net> =
wrote in message news:BB75278C.ECEA%freudenb...@prodigy.net...
Geez, how about this for making more sales to save your drowning in =
debt company? How about making cosmetics that look the same way they =
look in the container? How about mascaras that really work rather than =
coming out with a new one every month? I find Relvon to be the #1 =
culprit of this. Nothing EVER looks on the way you see it.... a waste of =
$$.
Elke
=
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––=
––––––––––––––––––––––––
––––––=_NextPart_000_0156_01C36ECF.491E3D30
Content–Type: text/html;
charset="iso–8859–1"
Content–Transfer–Encoding: quoted–printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "–//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Re: NEWS: Revlon Running Near Empty</TITLE>
<META http–equiv=3DContent–Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso–8859–1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1226" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>And how about not paying celebrities =
major $$$ to=20
be "spokesmodels"? Put the money towards the =
products.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING–RIGHT: 0px; PADDING–LEFT: 5px; MARGIN–LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER–LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN–RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"[ from Elke ] Von Freudenberg Enterprises" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:freudenb...@prodigy.net">freudenb...@prodigy.net</A>> =
wrote in=20
message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:BB75278C.ECEA%freudenb...@prodigy.net">news:BB75278C.ECEA%fr=
eudenb...@prodigy.net</A>...</DIV>
<DIV>Geez, how about this for making more sales to save your drowning =
in debt=20
company? How about making cosmetics that look the same way they look =
in the=20
container? How about mascaras that really work rather than coming out =
with a=20
new one every month? I find Relvon to be the #1 culprit of this. =
Nothing=20
EVER looks on the way you see it.... a waste of =
$$.<BR><BR>Elke<BR><FONT=20
=
color=3D#f06157>–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––=
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––<BR></FONT><FONT=20
color=3D#f06157></DIV></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
––––––=_NextPart_000_0156_01C36ECF.491E3D30––
––––––=_NextPart_000_0156_01C36ECF.491E3D30
Content–Type: text/plain;
charset="iso–8859–1"
Content–Transfer–Encoding: quoted–printable
Re: NEWS: Revlon Running Near EmptyAnd how about not paying celebrities =
major $$$ to be "spokesmodels"? Put the money towards the products.
"[ from Elke ] Von Freudenberg Enterprises" <freudenb...@prodigy.net> =
wrote in message news:BB75278C.ECEA%freudenb...@prodigy.net...
Geez, how about this for making more sales to save your drowning in =
debt company? How about making cosmetics that look the same way they =
look in the container? How about mascaras that really work rather than =
coming out with a new one every month? I find Relvon to be the #1 =
culprit of this. Nothing EVER looks on the way you see it.... a waste of =
$$.
Elke
=
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––=
––––––––––––––––––––––––
––––––=_NextPart_000_0156_01C36ECF.491E3D30
Content–Type: text/html;
charset="iso–8859–1"
Content–Transfer–Encoding: quoted–printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "–//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Re: NEWS: Revlon Running Near Empty</TITLE>
<META http–equiv=3DContent–Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso–8859–1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1226" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>And how about not paying celebrities =
major $$$ to=20
be "spokesmodels"? Put the money towards the =
products.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING–RIGHT: 0px; PADDING–LEFT: 5px; MARGIN–LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER–LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN–RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"[ from Elke ] Von Freudenberg Enterprises" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:freudenb...@prodigy.net">freudenb...@prodigy.net</A>> =
wrote in=20
message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:BB75278C.ECEA%freudenb...@prodigy.net">news:BB75278C.ECEA%fr=
eudenb...@prodigy.net</A>...</DIV>
<DIV>Geez, how about this for making more sales to save your drowning =
in debt=20
company? How about making cosmetics that look the same way they look =
in the=20
container? How about mascaras that really work rather than coming out =
with a=20
new one every month? I find Relvon to be the #1 culprit of this. =
Nothing=20
EVER looks on the way you see it.... a waste of =
$$.<BR><BR>Elke<BR><FONT=20
=
color=3D#f06157>–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––=
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––<BR></FONT><FONT=20
color=3D#f06157></DIV></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
––––––=_NextPart_000_0156_01C36ECF.491E3D30––