Re: OT/ NYC councilman shot

Could this go to email, please?
It's a conversation between only 2 people and it's wildly off–topic.
Thank you.
––
Julie P.
"if you don't know what is wrong with me/then you don't know what you've
missed"––Declan McManus

"Jjjjjulie" <jjjjju...@aol.comehither> wrote in message
news:20030723203131.14567.00000...@mb–m02.aol.com...
No it can't, now buhbye.

Jjjjjulie <jjjjju...@aol.comehither> wrote:
I agree, Jjjjjulie, but people are so trigger–happy these days I was
afraid to say anything.
Tom Parsons <grin/duck(ing bullets)>
––
––
...@panix.com | The sound of laughter has always seemed to me
| the most civilized music in the universe.
http://www.panix.com/~twp | ––Peter Ustinov

"El" <model–behav...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:DNGTa.22153$0F4.9...@nwrdny02.gnilink.net...
Yes they are and it's always the same ones doing it. Just ignore it and
post as you want.

Oh, thanks "K". :–)
I wouldn't want to be found guilty of having fun while being in a fashion
newsgroup!
After all, fashion is anything but fun. <VBG – joke>
Elliot


"K" <Kthyn...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:bfnedj$g3c2...@ID–146160.news.uni–berlin.de...

"El" <model–behav...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:q6HTa.22204$0F4.11...@nwrdny02.gnilink.net...
We have all kinds here and we have to endure those that haven't gone to
anger management school yet. Hang tight and by all means, be fashionable.
Some here feel they are entitled to say who can and cannot post here. I am
the real boss though. ;–) I say you stay.

Somehow I believe everything that you are saying ... :–))
I will not be deterred by The Victorian fashion members. LOL.
Elliot


"K" <Kthyn...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:bfneta$gahn...@ID–146160.news.uni–berlin.de...
am

"El" <model–behav...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:qdHTa.22249$0F4.2...@nwrdny02.gnilink.net...
Alright then. That's settled. :)

:–))


"K" <Kthyn...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:bfngbt$gqsr...@ID–146160.news.uni–berlin.de...

On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 01:22:59 +0000 (UTC), Tom <...@panix.com> wrote:
Could this go to email, please?
It's a conversation between only 2 people and it's wildly off–topic.
As one of my co–workers said a number of years ago while reading the
local police blotter: "[John Doe] was arrested for 'possession of
Valium, possession of Xanax, disorderly conduct.' Had he been using
the Valium and Xanax like he should have, there wouldn't have been any
disorderly conduct." <grin/duck>

"Charles Perrin" <c.l.perrin...@att.net> wrote in message
news:chjuhv0e4h8rm5f0fir3kn9sa8l30fv...@4ax.com...
Hmm, what's that?

X–No–archive: yes
El wrote:
Actually, *you* are in need of netiquette classes.
Not a problem though – I no longer care to read you.

All of that bs earlier should have gone to email and y'all didn't ask for it
to then! So don't expect it to now. geeeeee whizzzzzzzzz


"J Rogow" <JRo...@SpammenotNewsguy.com> wrote in message
news:bfnbi90...@enews4.newsguy.com...

Not a problem. I get along with everyone and my netiquette has been fine.
If it makes you happy not to "read me" then that's fine, it doesn't have any
affect on me either way. :–)
Have a wonderful day. :–)


"J Rogow" <JRo...@SpammenotNewsguy.com> wrote in message
news:bfnld40...@enews4.newsguy.com...