ucraym...@yahoo.com (raymond) wrote:
Dana Carpender wrote:
A great question, but nobody has actually responded yet, so I took
the liberty of reposting it. You know what they say about the fashion
police, they are never around when you need them...
Let's see ... thighbaring skirts, especially slitted; tube tops;
dresses that combine both (betcha thought that dress in the Lubriderm
commercial was only a towel ... SUPRISE! The fashion's been a
permanent mainstay on the scene since '98 or so); tummybaring outfits;
pants whose upper fringes are only inches away from the Promised Land
(to use Bill Maher's term); hiphugging miniskirts; even barefoot fashion
(like Cameron Diaz did in late June).
Not a whole lot there I see to hate in 20 years. Some things just
look hot forever, like the fashions from the late 1960's (well, except
for the part about the minidresses looking like maternity smocks).
OK. Maybe particulars then. Pamela Anderson's horrible makeup sense
in the 1990's. Never in the history of the world has such a great
beauty succeeded so well in ruining what nature gave her by such
an egregious sense of makeup usage. Christina Aguilerra (sp?) too,
until recently, for some reason insisted on using makeup to literally
go out of her way to uglify her natural beauty.