Home / alt.fashion / Monday, July 21, 2003

Why will we hate the clothes of today?

ucraym...@yahoo.com (raymond)
Dana Carpender wrote:
And what are we wearing today that we'll shudder at in 20 years' time?
A great question, but nobody has actually responded yet, so I took
the liberty of reposting it. You know what they say about the fashion
police, they are never around when you need them...
I think the average styles of the last 13 years won't inspire nearly
so much distaste in future observers as those of the 70's and 80's.
More boredom, perhaps. Nevertheless, there's never a shortage of
laughable attire. Here are some nominations from the last couple years.
I'm curious what other people would put up for ridicule.
Women's:
Knit sweaters (dusters?) with dangly floppy belts.
Acid–washed denim.
Those belts with double rows of holes. (There is a word, he thinks.
Gromit. No, that's a dog.)
Dumb trend of the summer: flip–flops. At least the ones that
actually flip and flop.
Belly–baring. (Maybe it's the wave of the future, kind of like when
women first started displaying their ankles. But I suspect not.)
Men's:
Teeny rectangular glasses.
Acid–washed denim.
And...hmmm...do men have silly fashions these days? I must not hang
out with the right crowd.
Ray
"CoFarb" <do...@cofarb.com>


"raymond" <ucraym...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b1fd2d47.0307210056.15001...@posting.google.com...

Dana Carpender wrote:
A great question, but nobody has actually responded yet, so I took
the liberty of reposting it. You know what they say about the fashion
police, they are never around when you need them...
I think the average styles of the last 13 years won't inspire nearly
so much distaste in future observers as those of the 70's and 80's.
More boredom, perhaps. Nevertheless, there's never a shortage of
laughable attire. Here are some nominations from the last couple years.
I'm curious what other people would put up for ridicule.
Women's:
Knit sweaters (dusters?) with dangly floppy belts.
Acid–washed denim.
Those belts with double rows of holes. (There is a word, he thinks.
Gromit. No, that's a dog.)
Dumb trend of the summer: flip–flops. At least the ones that
actually flip and flop.
Belly–baring. (Maybe it's the wave of the future, kind of like when
women first started displaying their ankles. But I suspect not.)
Men's:
Teeny rectangular glasses.
Acid–washed denim.
And...hmmm...do men have silly fashions these days? I must not hang
out with the right crowd.
Ray
As for men's hatable fashions, how about HUUUUGE pants and so–called shorts
(which are longer than a lot of capri pants worn by women) that are so big
that the male wearer must use one hand to prevent the pants from falling
off? Avoid the 2023 rush: hate them now!
Hatable in the future may also include any women's shoes with strangely
shaped heels, especially if, like the aforementioned pants, the wearer
cannot walk and wear them simultaneously.
cofarb, who spends her summers wearing a rainbow of Chucks––always wearable,
eternally sylish.
"rosie readandpost" <readandp...@REMOVETHISyahoo.com>
will everyone PLEASE pull their pants/shorts up?
i absolutely have seen enough belly buttons, and butt cracks to last me a lifetime!
––
read and post daily, it works!
rosie
"every day brings a chance to live free of regret and with as much joy, fun and laughter as you can stand."
................................oprah winfrey
joel <re...@optonline.net>
Well, I kind of have to disagree (respectfully) with some of he predictions. In
the early '60s when roach killing, linoleum crushing, pointy spikes were
popular –– high clunky platform shoes from the '40s (or '90s) would have looked
foreign to the eye and everyone would have hated them.
And you sort of really can't think of shoes the way you think of other clothing
articles. Better to think of them as sculpture. So a shoe from almost any
period with strong sculptural qualities is likely to be admired.
Bare tummies really relate to a proportional thing with pants. So if pants are
riding to the hip –– the right little tie top or halter top can be really cute.
Styles come and go, and they often reference the past. So a lot depends on what
our "eye" has grown accustomed to, and what we accepted as fashion societally.
My instincts tell me that a new generation is likely to really reject piercings
and tattoos. But I have a strong feeling I won't be around to see if I'm
right. So some of you younger folks have to remember for me.
joel
CoFarb wrote:


"raymond" <ucraym...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b1fd2d47.0307210056.15001...@posting.google.com...

As for men's hatable fashions, how about HUUUUGE pants and so–called shorts
(which are longer than a lot of capri pants worn by women) that are so big
that the male wearer must use one hand to prevent the pants from falling
off? Avoid the 2023 rush: hate them now!
Hatable in the future may also include any women's shoes with strangely
shaped heels, especially if, like the aforementioned pants, the wearer
cannot walk and wear them simultaneously.
cofarb, who spends her summers wearing a rainbow of Chucks––always wearable,
eternally sylish.
jmgarci...@aol.complain (Jpoijhgwedfg M. Gtgiokjhderfg Jr.)
Mal patted me on the head thus:
Get used to it, hon. Women's fashions are cyclic. I think the cycles are
getting shorter and shorter though.
I know THAT, but it's never the stuff I like on women that makes a comeback.
It's a damned plot, I tell ya.
–Joe in SoFla
I don't care, and you can't make me.
Diane Hardin <dia...@naming–schemes.org>
an a.f'er wrote:
Take one garment from
your childhood, combine with one from your mother's teenage years, poof!
You look so now!
de gustibus, baby!
–Diane
Charles Perrin <c.l.perrin...@att.net>
On 21 Jul 2003 18:22:23 GMT, maladic...@aol.com (Maladicta1) wrote:
Capri pants hit every 50 years apparently––they were very big in the
50s.
Except they were called "pedal pushers" back in the Dark Ages.
S./NYC <guiltyTAKETHISOUTpleas...@hotpop.com>
x–no–archive: yes
On anyone: Cargos. Fleece. Tiny framed eyeglasses. Aggressively,
carefully achieved messy hair.
On women: Brown lipstick. Shimmer everywhere. Blue and
similar nailpolish. Mallbrows, esp. mallbrows with that bit of
highlighter just under the arch. Aggressively straight hair. Platform
slides. Flipflops for street wear. Bare legs, even in winter. Low–waist,
straight hip pants. Bootcut everything. Bellies. Baby tees that are too
tight in the bust. Tank tops with bra straps (of any color) showing.
Actually, the cult of the tank top, period. Capris. That black stretchy
polyester stuff as an entire wardrobe (Logan's Run much?). Black just–
below–knee–high boots with around a 2" thickish heel (is there anyone
here who hasn't had a pair of these? yawn).
–S./NYC
maladic...@aol.com (Maladicta1)
S/NYC>Brown lipstick.
Shimmer everywhere. Blue and
similar nailpolish. Mallbrows, esp. mallbrows with that bit of
highlighter just under the arch. Aggressively straight hair. Platform
slides. Flipflops for street wear. Bare legs, even in winter.
Low–waist,
straight hip pants. Bootcut everything. Bellies. Baby tees that are too
tight in the bust. Tank tops with bra straps (of any color) showing.
Actually, the cult of the tank top, period. Capris. That black stretch
polyester stuff as an entire wardrobe (Logan's Run much?). Black just–
below–knee–high boots with around a 2" thickish heel (is there anyone
here who hasn't had a pair of these? yawn).
..
I agree with all but the following:
Tank tops and bootleg pants go back at least 30 years. I think they're
classic. Capri pants hit every 50 years apparently––they were very big in the
50s.
Anywhere there's snow and icy streets, low–heeled boots will survive. Less a
fashion item than a staple.
The stretchy Chico's clothing (which is not polyester, by the way) may not
survive because it's being aggressively knocked off, but the idea of a
collection of washable, packable knits has been around since Units. The concept
will be around for awhile because women who travel love it. Synthetics will
keep getting better and better.
Platforms seem to catch on every 30 years––40s, 70s, 00s. Like Arnold
Schwartzenegger, they'll be back.
jmgarci...@aol.complain (Jpoijhgwedfg M. Gtgiokjhderfg Jr.)
Mal said:
I agree with all but the following:
Tank tops and bootleg pants go back at least 30 years. I think they're
classic. Capri pants hit every 50 years apparently––they were very big in the
50s.
Anywhere there's snow and icy streets, low–heeled boots will survive. Less a
fashion item than a staple.
The stretchy Chico's clothing (which is not polyester, by the way) may not
survive because it's being aggressively knocked off, but the idea of a
collection of washable, packable knits has been around since Units. The
concept
will be around for awhile because women who travel love it. Synthetics will
keep getting better and better.
Platforms seem to catch on every 30 years––40s, 70s, 00s. Like Arnold
Schwartzenegger, they'll be back.
Oy. This is like scheduling a hangover.
Looking for a comfy spot to assume a fetal position,
–Joe in SoFla
I don't care, and you can't make me.
maladic...@aol.com (Maladicta1)
Oy. This is like scheduling a hangover.
Looking for a comfy spot to assume a fetal position,
–Joe in SoFla
Get used to it, hon. Women's fashions are cyclic. I think the cycles are
getting shorter and shorter though.
A few years ago, I gave my young niece a set of 50's "at home" wear––an emerald
green satin oriental jacket with 3/4 sleeves and black dull satin capris with
vents. It became her favorite evening outfit..
jjjjju...@aol.comehither (Jjjjjulie)
On women: Brown lipstick. Shimmer everywhere. Blue and
similar nailpolish. Mallbrows, esp. mallbrows with that bit of
highlighter just under the arch. Aggressively straight hair. Platform
slides. Flipflops for street wear. Bare legs, even in winter. Low–waist,
straight hip pants. Bootcut everything. Bellies. Baby tees that are too
tight in the bust. Tank tops with bra straps (of any color) showing.
Actually, the cult of the tank top, period. Capris. That black stretchy
polyester stuff as an entire wardrobe (Logan's Run much?). Black just–
below–knee–high boots with around a 2" thickish heel (is there anyone
here who hasn't had a pair of these? yawn).
I concur with all of these (and I also note that I have never owned any of
these).
To these I would like to add those polyester (sometimes doubleknit) pants I see
on 20somethings (usually in a horrible dove grey) which bear a striking
resemblence to what my grandmother used to wear (but which cost 10x what she
paid for hers).
––
Julie P.
"if you don't know what is wrong with me/then you don't know what you've
missed"––Declan McManus
S./NYC <guiltyTAKETHISOUTpleas...@hotpop.com>
x–no–archive: yes
laurie0...@earthlink.net says...
On women: Brown lipstick. Shimmer everywhere. Blue and
similar nailpolish. Mallbrows, esp. mallbrows with that bit of
highlighter just under the arch.
What exactly do you mean by "mallbrows?" Do you mean a very thin high
arched brow, a kind of brow some people call the sperm brow, or something
different? Just wondering!
Very groomed, very arched, thinnish, obvious use of color/grooming
products. That shape that more than half of the white women under age 40
or 50 on the street had for a while, and what walks out of every cheapo
waxing place I've seen. So I'd include sperm brows but not limit my
future sneer to them.
–S./NYC
"ahmward" <nospam.ahmw...@yahoo.com>


"Charles Perrin" <c.l.perrin...@att.net> wrote in message
news:uvaphv8cgmc91f84dpnghk11tn0i6c3...@4ax.com...

On 21 Jul 2003 18:22:23 GMT, maladic...@aol.com (Maladicta1) wrote:
Except they were called "pedal pushers" back in the Dark Ages.
They were also called clam diggers except most of us who wore them never dug
for clams.
Audrey
Dana Carpender <dcarp...@kiva.net>
Charles Perrin wrote:
On 21 Jul 2003 18:22:23 GMT, maladic...@aol.com (Maladicta1) wrote:
Except they were called "pedal pushers" back in the Dark Ages.
Or "clam diggers."
––
Dana W. Carpender
Howard Dean For President
Take Back the Democratic Party!
Take Back America!
http://www.deanforamerica.com
isoportablel...@yahoo.com (what to do)
absolutely agree with flip flop hating although split toe footwear is
meant for people with toes like mine. :P
Userb3 <use...@yahoo.com>
Tom <...@panix.com> wrote in news:bg38so$j1...@reader1.panix.com:
Then there was a young lady, so fresh & young & enticing to a dirty
old man like me. Then one day we were doing stretches, she was
wearing a short top, & I caught sight of what she had in her navel....
What was it? Lint? Ham sandwich? The Lindbergh baby?
p...@midway.uchicago.edu (Trilby)
New clothes designed to look like vintage clothes are probably the
stupidest idea to gain currency in the past decade.
I got a catalog from Urban Outfitters and it's full of brand–new t–shirts
for $24 that look like someone bought them at Dollar A Pound. Ditto
trucker camps. So now some rich suburban kid can spend a few hundred
dollars to look like he scoured Goodwill for clothes. And not interesting
vintage pieces, but tacky polyester blend crap from the 70s.
Karl Lagerfeld said recently that kitsch has gotten boring. I agree.
(He probably sounded like Dieter from "Sprockets" when he said it, but I
still agree.)
Priscilla
––
p...@midway.uchicago.edu "Here comes the most beautiful woman in puppetland!"
kerricl...@aol.comma (Kerri Clair)
ucraym...@yahoo.com (raymond) wrote:
I'm curious what other people would put up for ridicule.
Women's:
Too–tight capris
Capris with wild prints
Cargo–style capris (really, they're out there)
Low–rise pants complete with 'plumber butt'
Body piercings and tattoos
Men's:
Pants or jeans 4 sizes too big
Boxer shorts peeking out tops of pants
Socks with sandals
Large high–tops left untied
Cargo shorts
Backward baseball caps
Hawaiian shirts
Body piercings and tattoos
Mohawks, mullets, or other strange hair cuts
–Kerri
maladic...@aol.com (Maladicta1)
kerricl...@aol.comma :
Socks with sandals
Has this ever been in?
Cargo shorts
I think khaki or olive army–style shorts are a classic. They've been around for
years.
Hawaiian shirts
I started collecting mine in the 70s. They go in and out, but they're really
classic because they make people smile.
whopk...@csd.uwm.edu (Alfred Einstead)
ucraym...@yahoo.com (raymond) wrote:
Dana Carpender wrote:
A great question, but nobody has actually responded yet, so I took
the liberty of reposting it. You know what they say about the fashion
police, they are never around when you need them...
Let's see ... thigh–baring skirts, especially slitted; tube tops;
dresses that combine both (betcha thought that dress in the Lubriderm
commercial was only a towel ... SUPRISE! The fashion's been a
permanent mainstay on the scene since '98 or so); tummy–baring outfits;
pants whose upper fringes are only inches away from the Promised Land
(to use Bill Maher's term); hip–hugging miniskirts; even barefoot fashion
(like Cameron Diaz did in late June).
Not a whole lot there I see to hate in 20 years. Some things just
look hot forever, like the fashions from the late 1960's (well, except
for the part about the minidresses looking like maternity smocks).
OK. Maybe particulars then. Pamela Anderson's horrible makeup sense
in the 1990's. Never in the history of the world has such a great
beauty succeeded so well in ruining what nature gave her by such
an egregious sense of makeup usage. Christina Aguilerra (sp?) too,
until recently, for some reason insisted on using makeup to literally
go out of her way to uglify her natural beauty.
Dana Carpender <dcarp...@kiva.net>
CoFarb wrote:


"raymond" <ucraym...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b1fd2d47.0307210056.15001...@posting.google.com...

As for men's hatable fashions, how about HUUUUGE pants and so–called shorts
(which are longer than a lot of capri pants worn by women) that are so big
that the male wearer must use one hand to prevent the pants from falling
off? Avoid the 2023 rush: hate them now!
I've hated the baggy pants look since the beginning. There's something
just *wrong* about young men with, er, attractive posteriors wearing
their pants so loose.
Dana W. Carpender
Howard Dean For President
Take Back the Democratic Party!
Take Back America!
http://www.deanforamerica.com
Dana Carpender <dcarp...@kiva.net>
"S./NYC" wrote:
x–no–archive: yes
On anyone: Cargos. Fleece. Tiny framed eyeglasses. Aggressively,
carefully achieved messy hair.
On women: Brown lipstick. Shimmer everywhere.
I think serious shimmer is aging once you're past about 25. But that's
just me.
Blue and
similar nailpolish. Mallbrows, esp. mallbrows with that bit of
highlighter just under the arch. Aggressively straight hair. Platform
slides. Flipflops for street wear. Bare legs, even in winter.
Here's one I never understood. I'm sorry, I will *never* agree to go
out on a 20 degree with bare legs. I'll hang first.
Low–waist,
straight hip pants. Bootcut everything. Bellies. Baby tees that are too
tight in the bust. Tank tops with bra straps (of any color) showing.
Actually, the cult of the tank top, period.
But... but... they're so incredibly comfortable on hot days, and I think
they're flattering to a lot of people, including me. Anyway, tanks are
like tees. They're classic.
––
Dana W. Carpender
Howard Dean For President
Take Back the Democratic Party!
Take Back America!
http://www.deanforamerica.com
jmgarci...@aol.complain (Jpoijhgwedfg M. Gtgiokjhderfg Jr.)
Ray,
For want of a better analogy, a man's gorge is equivalent to his "cleavage."
–Joe in SoFla
I don't care, and you can't make me.
jmgarci...@aol.complain (Jpoijhgwedfg M. Gtgiokjhderfg Jr.)
Gorge = suit's "plunging neckline"
Sheesh, you people...
–Joe in SoFla
I don't care, and you can't make me.
Userb3 <use...@yahoo.com>
jmgarci...@aol.complain (Jpoijhgwedfg M. Gtgiokjhderfg Jr.) wrote in
news:20030729084834.20257.00000...@mb–m29.aol.com:
Gorge = suit's "plunging neckline"
Sheesh, you people...
Please forgive our shortcomings.
S./NYC <guiltyTAKETHISOUTpleas...@hotpop.com>
x–no–archive: yes
Aaarg, public apology to S./NYC. I didn't notice the x–no–archive line when
I posted.
Heh, no problem.
Thanks, though.
–S./NYC
Charles Perrin <c.l.perrin...@att.net>
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:00:21 GMT, p...@midway.uchicago.edu (Trilby)
wrote:
Whoops, that's "trucker caps."
Just as long as they're not backwards.... interesting how teen boys
show their individuality by wearing caps backwards en masse.
<grin/duck>
fig <figfuns...@earthlink.not>
Trilby wrote:
New clothes designed to look like vintage clothes are probably the
stupidest idea to gain currency in the past decade.
I got a catalog from Urban Outfitters and it's full of brand–new t–shirts
for $24 that look like someone bought them at Dollar A Pound. Ditto
trucker camps. So now some rich suburban kid can spend a few hundred
dollars to look like he scoured Goodwill for clothes. And not interesting
vintage pieces, but tacky polyester blend crap from the 70s.
Karl Lagerfeld said recently that kitsch has gotten boring. I agree.
(He probably sounded like Dieter from "Sprockets" when he said it, but I
still agree.)
Priscilla
<wiping away a tear>
OK, the first two paragraphs made me chuckle but the last one made me
cry. Thank you!
fig
––––
Who's The Fairest?
www.whosthefairest.com
ami kio <...@cant–take–anymore–spam.com>
On 7/21/03 10:40 AM, in article
MPG.1985d47cff08403d989...@news.earthlink.net, "S./NYC"
<guiltyTAKETHISOUTpleas...@hotpop.com> wrote:
x–no–archive: yes
On anyone: Cargos. Fleece. Tiny framed eyeglasses. Aggressively,
carefully achieved messy hair.
On women: Brown lipstick. Shimmer everywhere. Blue and
similar nailpolish. Mallbrows, esp. mallbrows with that bit of
highlighter just under the arch. Aggressively straight hair. Platform
slides. Flipflops for street wear. Bare legs, even in winter. Low–waist,
straight hip pants. Bootcut everything. Bellies. Baby tees that are too
tight in the bust. Tank tops with bra straps (of any color) showing.
Actually, the cult of the tank top, period. Capris. That black stretchy
polyester stuff as an entire wardrobe (Logan's Run much?). Black just–
below–knee–high boots with around a 2" thickish heel (is there anyone
here who hasn't had a pair of these? yawn).
–S./NYC
I could live without all of those except the low–rise pants. I avoid
plumber's butt pants, but a waistline a few inches below my bellybutton is
so much more flattering.
ami
ucraym...@yahoo.com (raymond)
jmgarci...@aol.complain (Jpoijhgwedfg M. Gtgiokjhderfg Jr.) wrote in message news:<20030721085824.09715.00000...@mb–m11.aol.com>...
And...hmmm...do men have silly fashions these days?
Oh, dear...I dunno if I have enough time to write that much.
* Those minor 3rd Reich bureaucrat teeny glasses
* Elephant legged pants
* Below–the–knee shorts
* High–gorge, skinny lapel suits
* Square toed shoes
* Flared or boot–cut (some exceptions to the latter will apply) trousers/jeans
* Anything Lenny Kravitz wears onstage
More later as my nightmares return.
I regret to say that in my cultural grouping, men's styles are far too casual
and boring to have first–class humor value. Besides the glasses, none of
those styles have caught on as far as I've noticed.
* High–gorge, skinny lapel suits
I have not heard this description before. Is it a technical fashion term,
or is based on a usage like: "so revolting was this style that his gorge rose."
Ray
p...@midway.uchicago.edu (Trilby)
In article <20030722083733.13232.00000...@mb–m10.aol.com>,
Jpoijhgwedfg M. Gtgiokjhderfg Jr. <jmgarci...@aol.complain> wrote:
Ray,
For want of a better analogy, a man's gorge is equivalent to his "cleavage."
–Joe in SoFla
Except that I've heard of things making someone's gorge rise. You know,
having to watch film footage of gruesome surgical procedures, really awful
food combinations, Pauly Shore. But I've never had anything short of well–
engineered underwear make my cleavage rise. Grin Duck.
Priscilla
––
p...@midway.uchicago.edu "Here comes the most beautiful woman in puppetland!"
Tom <...@panix.com>
Userb3 <use...@yahoo.com> wrote:
jmgarci...@aol.complain (Jpoijhgwedfg M. Gtgiokjhderfg Jr.) wrote in
news:20030722083733.13232.00000...@mb–m10.aol.com:
a man's gorge is equivalent to his "cleavage."
gorge?
As in soutien–gorge? Hard to credit, except in cases of gynecomastia...
Tom Parsons
––
––
...@panix.com | The sound of laughter has always seemed to me
| the most civilized music in the universe.
http://www.panix.com/~twp | ––Peter Ustinov
cindyetta <cindye...@yahoo.com>
I got, and adore, one of those t shirts. It has a picture of a cute
pig, holing a bouquet of flowers, and it says "Please don't eat me, I
love you!" It makes me very happy to wear it (vegetarian since I was
11, usually pretty private about it, but this t is hilarious, and gets
a point across adorably).
cindyetta
In article <B5USa.14$N4.7...@news.uchicago.edu>, Trilby
<p...@midway.uchicago.edu> wrote:
New clothes designed to look like vintage clothes are probably the
stupidest idea to gain currency in the past decade.
I got a catalog from Urban Outfitters and it's full of brand–new t–shirts
for $24 that look like someone bought them at Dollar A Pound. Ditto
trucker camps. So now some rich suburban kid can spend a few hundred
dollars to look like he scoured Goodwill for clothes. And not interesting
vintage pieces, but tacky polyester blend crap from the 70s.
Karl Lagerfeld said recently that kitsch has gotten boring. I agree.
(He probably sounded like Dieter from "Sprockets" when he said it, but I
still agree.)
Priscilla
"K" <Kthyn...@aol.com>


"cindyetta" <cindye...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:210720032140470286%cindye...@yahoo.com...

I got, and adore, one of those t shirts. It has a picture of a cute
pig, holing a bouquet of flowers, and it says "Please don't eat me, I
love you!" It makes me very happy to wear it (vegetarian since I was
11, usually pretty private about it, but this t is hilarious, and gets
a point across adorably).
That sounds so cute. Where did you get it?
ami kio <...@cant–take–anymore–spam.com>
On 7/21/03 8:36 PM, in article
BB41FF57.3FD24%...@cant–take–anymore–spam.com, "ami kio"
<...@cant–take–anymore–spam.com> wrote:
On anyone: Cargos. Fleece. Tiny framed eyeglasses. Aggressively,
carefully achieved messy hair.
On women: Brown lipstick. Shimmer everywhere. Blue and
similar nailpolish. Mallbrows, esp. mallbrows with that bit of
highlighter just under the arch. Aggressively straight hair. Platform
slides. Flipflops for street wear. Bare legs, even in winter. Low–waist,
straight hip pants. Bootcut everything. Bellies. Baby tees that are too
tight in the bust. Tank tops with bra straps (of any color) showing.
Actually, the cult of the tank top, period. Capris. That black stretchy
polyester stuff as an entire wardrobe (Logan's Run much?). Black just–
below–knee–high boots with around a 2" thickish heel (is there anyone
here who hasn't had a pair of these? yawn).
–S./NYC
I could live without all of those except the low–rise pants. I avoid
plumber's butt pants, but a waistline a few inches below my bellybutton is
so much more flattering.
ami
Aaarg, public apology to S./NYC. I didn't notice the x–no–archive line when
I posted.
ami
Charles Perrin <c.l.perrin...@att.net>
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 06:45:44 –0400, "CoFarb" <do...@cofarb.com> wrote:
As for men's hatable fashions, how about HUUUUGE pants and
so–called shorts (which are longer than a lot of capri pants worn
by women) that are so big that the male wearer must use one
hand to prevent the pants from falling off? Avoid the 2023
rush: hate them now!
One of my Web site readers pointed out when they looked at my Web site
that they wore SHORTS when they played basketball in Chucks.
KMS <badgerda...@puttyhead.combustible>
Trilby wrote:
In article <B5USa.14$N4.7...@news.uchicago.edu>,
Trilby <p...@midway.uchicago.edu> wrote:
Whoops, that's "trucker caps."
Well damn, I thought I had found something new to occupy the kids next summer.
–KMS
fashionwi...@yahoo.com (the Wicked Witch)
Black just–
below–knee–high boots with around a 2" thickish heel (is there anyone
here who hasn't had a pair of these? yawn).
Me, me! I've never had a pair of those. When the boot craze started up
a few years ago, I looked and looked for *The Pair*. I never found any
that I loved, and eventually I got kinda sick of seeing the boots on
everyone else and didn't want them anymore.
––
the Wicked Witch
p...@midway.uchicago.edu (Trilby)
In article <3F1C749C.4070...@earthlink.not>,
fig <figfuns...@earthlink.not> wrote:
<wiping away a tear>
OK, the first two paragraphs made me chuckle but the last one made me
cry. Thank you!
fig
I made you cry? Cool! Maybe I can get a job writing for The Onion. ;)
Priscilla
––
p...@midway.uchicago.edu "Here comes the most beautiful woman in puppetland!"
g...@tucker–kellogg.com (Greg Tucker–Kellogg)
Userb3 <use...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<Xns93C661ECF40F3Elvisisal...@207.14.113.17>...
Tom <...@panix.com> wrote in news:bg38so$j1...@reader1.panix.com:
What was it? Lint? Ham sandwich? The Lindbergh baby?
When I was a lad at summer camp, our camp counselor told us proudly of
having made a heart–shaped pincushion for his mother as a Valentine's
Day gift, painstakely stuffed with his own belly–button lint.
Greg
Userb3 <use...@yahoo.com>
g...@tucker–kellogg.com (Greg Tucker–Kellogg) wrote in
news:5f45c924.0307291430.37ddd...@posting.google.com:


Userb3 <use...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns93C661ECF40F3Elvisisal...@207.14.113.17>...

When I was a lad at summer camp, our camp counselor told us proudly of
having made a heart–shaped pincushion for his mother as a Valentine's
Day gift, painstakely stuffed with his own belly–button lint.
I'm sure she was touched.
Dana Carpender <dcarp...@kiva.net>
Greg Tucker–Kellogg wrote:
Userb3 <use...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<Xns93C661ECF40F3Elvisisal...@207.14.113.17>...
When I was a lad at summer camp, our camp counselor told us proudly of
having made a heart–shaped pincushion for his mother as a Valentine's
Day gift, painstakely stuffed with his own belly–button lint.
Boy, and the counselors at our camp were busy telling us about The
Purple Bishop (your basic psycho kid–killer story) and recounting the
plot of Texas Chainsaw Massacre, complete with sound effects. What kind
of wussy camp did you go to? ;–D
––
Dana W."And this was *church* camp, mind you..." Carpender
Howard Dean For President
Take Back the Democratic Party!
Take Back America!
http://www.deanforamerica.com